Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAli, K
dc.contributor.authorCoombes, L
dc.contributor.authorKay, E
dc.contributor.authorTredwin, C
dc.contributor.authorJones, G
dc.contributor.authorRicketts, C
dc.contributor.authorBennett, J
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-14T09:57:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-02T12:00:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-02T12:02:26Z
dc.date.available2015-12-14T09:57:23Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-11
dc.identifier.issn1600-0579
dc.identifier.issn1600-0579
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5162
dc.descriptionkeywords: assessment, longitudinal, dental, progress testing
dc.description.abstract

Background Progress testing is well established as a longitudinal form of assessment in undergraduate medical programmes to measure growth in knowledge. Peninsula Dental School is the first school to use progress testing and remains the only one to do so. Aims To share the experience of developing progress testing in an undergraduate dental programme as a major summative assessment tool at a newly established dental school in the United Kingdom. Methods Data were collected for progress tests conducted from 2007 to 14. The tests were formative in the first 2 years of the programme and summative in subsequent years. Each test was based on 100 single best answer multiple-choice items with an appropriate vignette. The students chose their answer from 5 options. A score 1 mark is awarded for each correct answer, minus 0.25 for an incorrect answer and 0 for ‘don’t know’ (DK). The standard setting for each sitting was carried out using Angoff and Hofstee methods. Results There were two tests per year with each cohort undertaking eight tests in their 4 years of study providing a total 14 test occasions. The reliability of each test for each student cohort tests was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. The average reliability over 42 test/cohort combinations was 0.753 (±SD 0.08). Data analyses show growth in knowledge of dental students across successive years with the largest increase in knowledge observed between tests 1 and 5 and concomitant reduction in DK responses. Conclusion This is the first study to report the establishment and use of progress testing as the principle form of written summative testing in an undergraduate dental curriculum. Progress testing is a valid and reliable tool to assess growth in knowledge longitudinally over the duration of a dental programme. Although a labour-intensive process, progress testing merits more widespread use in dental programmes.

dc.format.extent129-134
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.replaceshttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3947
dc.relation.replaces10026.1/3947
dc.relation.replaceshttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5161
dc.relation.replaces10026.1/5161
dc.subjectassessment
dc.subjectlongitudinal
dc.subjectdental
dc.subjectprogress testing
dc.titleProgress testing in undergraduate dental education: the Peninsula experience and future opportunities
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typearticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874344
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume20
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eje.12149
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalEuropean Journal of Dental Education
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/eje.12149
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Dental School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-03-16
dc.rights.embargodate2017-7-11
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0579
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/eje.12149
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-07-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV