Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPratt, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorShaughnessy, J
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-18T13:23:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-11
dc.identifier.issn0142-5692
dc.identifier.issn1465-3346
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17607
dc.description.abstract

Over the last 30 years higher education has seen a rise in new managerialism across all its activity, driven by neoliberal economic policy. Professional doctorates (PDs) have been part of this rise, increasing in number considerably and spawning a related interest in researching doctoral work. However, there have been few studies focused on how students develop an understanding of theory/theorisation and how supervision supports it. This paper reports on a research project involving interviews with supervisors from professional doctorate in education programmes in the UK, as a particular example of PDs in general, to explore the process of theorisation. Drawing on Bernstein, it shows how supervision, and wider programme design, are mediated by the increasingly managerial context of doctoral study. The study raises questions about the ways in which students and supervisors engage with both methodology and theory/theorisation in working together and subsequent implications for the quality of doctoral work.

dc.format.extent1123-1138
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)
dc.subjectDoctorate
dc.subjecttheory
dc.subjecttheorisation
dc.subjectsupervision
dc.subjectnew managerialism
dc.subjectBernstein
dc.titleThe effects of managerialism in higher education on doctoral theorising: time to think?
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000695148900001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue8
plymouth.volume42
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBritish Journal of Sociology of Education
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01425692.2021.1971064
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Institute of Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-08-18
dc.rights.embargodate2021-10-6
dc.identifier.eissn1465-3346
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/01425692.2021.1971064
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-09-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV