Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSwancutt, D
dc.contributor.authorJoel-Edgar, S
dc.contributor.authorAllen, M
dc.contributor.authorThomas, D
dc.contributor.authorBrant, H
dc.contributor.authorBenger, J
dc.contributor.authorByng, R
dc.contributor.authorPinkney, J
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-11T09:14:01Z
dc.date.available2017-08-11T09:14:01Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.other436
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9761
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing pressure in the United Kingdom (UK) urgent care system has led to Emergency Departments (EDs) failing to meet the national requirement that 95% of patients are admitted, discharged or transferred within 4-h of arrival. Despite the target being the same for all acute hospitals, individual Trusts organise their services in different ways. The impact of this variation on patient journey time and waiting is unknown. Our study aimed to apply the Lean technique of Value Stream Mapping (VSM) to investigate care processes and delays in patient journeys at four contrasting hospitals. METHODS: VSM timing data were collected for patients accessing acute care at four hospitals in South West England. Data were categorised according to waits and activities, which were compared across sites to identify variations in practice from the patient viewpoint. We included Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) to fully interpret our findings; observations and initial findings were considered in a PPI workshop. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients were recruited, comprising 25,432 min of patient time containing 4098 episodes of care or waiting. The median patient journey was 223 min (3 h, 43 min); just within the 4-h target. Although total patient journey times were similar between sites, the stage where the greatest proportion of waiting occurred varied. Reasons for waiting were dominated by waits for beds, investigations or results to be available. From our sample we observed that EDs without a discharge/clinical decision area exhibited a greater proportion of waiting time following an admission or discharge decision. PPI interpretation indicated that patients who experience waits at the beginning of their journey feel more anxious because they are 'not in the system yet'. CONCLUSIONS: The novel application of VSM analysis across different hospitals, coupled with PPI interpretation, provides important insight into the impact of care provision on patient experience. Measures that could reduce patient waiting include automatic notification of test results, and the option of discharge/clinical decision areas for patients awaiting results or departure. To enhance patient experience, good communication with patients and relatives about reasons for waits is essential.

dc.format.extent0-0
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectHealth service research
dc.subjectAcute care
dc.subjectEmergency admissions
dc.subjectPatient care
dc.subjectValue stream mapping
dc.subjectEmergency department
dc.subjectPatient public involvement
dc.titleNot all waits are equal: an exploratory investigation of emergency care patient pathways
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28646876
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume17
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBMC Health Services Research
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-017-2349-2
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-06-01
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6963
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargo
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12913-017-2349-2
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
plymouth.funderHow can frontline expertise and new models of care best contribute to safely reducing avoidable acute admissions?::NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre
plymouth.oa-locationhttps://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-017-2349-2


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV