Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAyres, Richard
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorRegan de Bere, Sam
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-07T10:16:02Z
dc.date.available2016-10-07T10:16:02Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-15
dc.identifier.issn2312-7996
dc.identifier.issn2312-7996
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5577
dc.description.abstract

<ns4:p>This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. PurposeIt is increasingly recognised that medical schools have a duty to the communities they serve, and that there are many benefits to be gained from student social engagement within those communities. There is also ongoing interest in the value of inter-professional working. Social engagement takes many forms, and benefits to student learning are likely to be multi-faceted. We conducted a detailed qualitative analysis of a "Making a Difference" community project; to investigate pedagogic benefits, to identify how students could indeed 'make a difference' with a population with complex health needs, and to explore the value added by inter-professional working. In framing the character of social engagement, we classified activities into community-orientated, community-based and community engaged education and considered our findings within these contexts.MethodsThe project provided interdisciplinary experiences for student volunteers from medicine and nine other healthcare disciplines (ten professions in total), in attachments to three community-based providers. In addition, students collaboratively organised and delivered a one-day health promotion event for the entire community at a health facility in an area of high social deprivation. Extensive qualitative data were collected from student diaries, interviews and focus groups with students and provider organisation staff. The findings were analysed thematically using NVivo, and as a first level of analysis were mapped onto a modified Kirkpatrick framework of evaluation.ResultsStudents gained new insights, knowledge and skills; these arising from both the community experience and from working with different disciplines. Analysis identified pedagogic benefit at all 4 Kirkpatrick levels. Students were able to contribute in diverse and sometimes unexpected ways. Our data suggest that many other benefits such as development of deeper relationships, opportunities for communication of feelings, breaking down of class and professional barriers resulted from the experience.ConclusionsThe two activity components of the project (attachments and health promotion event) provided distinct but complementary experiences. It is clear from the data that students enjoyed the often new experience of working with peers from other disciplines. They also enjoyed, but were greatly challenged by, working with service users with multiple and complex needs, such as when they were placed with providers working with homeless persons for example. There was strong evidence of new learning, with clear examples of change of practice resulting from these experiences. We considered that the project provided mostly community-based, but also some community-engaged, experiences. Philosophically, sending healthcare students into communities represents a radical change of practice for medical and nursing schools, and our second level of analysis has included theoretical attention to this idea. Further work is ongoing.</ns4:p>

dc.format.extent81-81
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherF1000 Research Ltd
dc.subjectBehavioral and Social Science
dc.subjectClinical Research
dc.subjectBasic Behavioral and Social Science
dc.subjectHealth Services
dc.subject8.1 Organisation and delivery of services
dc.subjectGeneric health relevance
dc.titleGetting real in the community: Evaluating the “making a difference” interdisciplinary social engagement project
dc.typejournal-article
plymouth.volume5
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalMedEDPublish
dc.identifier.doi10.15694/mep.2016.000081
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-09-15
dc.identifier.eissn2312-7996
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargo
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.15694/mep.2016.000081
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-09-15
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV