Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKar, D
dc.contributor.authorGillies, C
dc.contributor.authorZaccardi, F
dc.contributor.authorWebb, D
dc.contributor.authorSeidu, S
dc.contributor.authorTesfaye, S
dc.contributor.authorDavies, M
dc.contributor.authorKhunti, K
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T15:52:29Z
dc.date.available2024-03-07T15:52:29Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.issn1475-2840
dc.identifier.issn1475-2840
dc.identifier.other158
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/22148
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Smoking is associated with increased macrovascular and microvascular complications in people with diabetes. In addition to other concomitant vascular perturbations, it also seems to influence the cardiometabolic parameters, which may partly explain the accelerated rate of vascular complications in smokers with diabetes. While smoking cessation is advocated as a universal component of the management of diabetes, there is some anecdotal evidence that HbA1c could increase following smoking cessation. The aim of this review is to explore the relationship between smoking and its cessation on cardiometabolic parameters in diabetes. METHODS: Searches were conducted on Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL up to March 2016. After screening 6866 studies (Additional file 1), 14 observational studies with a total of 98,978 participants' with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes were selected for review. Narrative synthesis and meta-analyses were carried out to explore the relationship between smoking and its cessation. RESULTS: Meta-analysis showed that the pooled mean difference of HbA1c between non-smokers and smokers was -0.61% (95% CI -0.88 to -0.33, p < 0.0001). The difference in LDL cholesterol between non-smokers and smokers was -0.11 mmol/l (95% CI -0.21 to -0.01, p = 0.04). The difference in HDL cholesterol between non-smokers and smokers was 0.12 mmol/l (95% CI 0.08-0.15, p < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in blood pressure between the two groups. The difference in HbA1c between quitters and continued smokers was not statistically significant -0.10% (95% CI -0.42 to 0.21, p = 0.53). However, a narrative synthesis revealed that over a period of 10 years, the HbA1c was comparable between non-smokers and quitters. CONCLUSION: Non-smokers have a statistically significant lower HbA1c and more favourable lipid profile compared to smokers. Smoking cessation does not lead to an increase in HbA1c in long-term and may reduce vascular complications in diabetes by its favourable impact on lipid profile.

dc.format.extent158-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectSmoking
dc.subjectSmoking cessation
dc.subjectGlycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
dc.subjectDiabetes
dc.subjectLow density lipoprotein (LDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol: blood pressure (systolic and diastolic-SBP and DBP)
dc.titleRelationship of cardiometabolic parameters in non-smokers, current smokers, and quitters in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeReview
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881170
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume15
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0475-5
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalCardiovascular Diabetology
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12933-016-0475-5
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|Peninsula Medical School
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-11-10
dc.date.updated2024-03-07T15:52:29Z
dc.identifier.eissn1475-2840
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12933-016-0475-5


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV