Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPedlar, M
dc.contributor.authorEmery, MJ
dc.contributor.authorWarburton, PJ
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-01T13:26:32Z
dc.date.available2024-02-01T13:26:32Z
dc.date.issued2024-01
dc.identifier.issn0300-9084
dc.identifier.issn1638-6183
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21992
dc.description.abstract

Since its inception in the 1980s, advancements in PCR technology using improved thermal cyclers, engineered DNA polymerases and commercial master mixes, have led to increased PCR productivity. Despite these advancements, PCR cycling protocols have largely remained unchanged over the same period. This study aimed to systemically evaluate the effect of reduced PCR cycling parameters on amplicon production. The 1466bp fragment from the 16S rRNA gene present in low-, medium- and high-CG bacteria was amplified using three commercially available PCR master mixes. The shortest cycling parameters required to successfully amplify the 16S fragment from all bacteria and master mixes comprised 30-cycles of 5 s denaturation, 25 s annealing, and 25 s extension. While all produced an amplicon with sufficient yield to enable downstream sequence analysis, the PCRBIO Ultra Mix in conjunction with the shortened parameters was found to achieve the highest amplicon yield across low-, medium- and high CG bacteria. Comparing the run times to that of a typical 16S PCR protocol, the shortened cycling parameters reduced the program duration by 46 % and consumed 50 % less electricity, translating into increased productivity and helping to improve laboratory environmental sustainability.

dc.format.extentS0300-9084(24)00031-2-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subject16S rRNA
dc.subjectEnvironmental sustainability
dc.subjectPCR
dc.subjectThermal cycling
dc.titleAmplifying PCR productivity and environmental sustainability through shortened cycling protocols
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38262587
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBiochimie
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biochi.2024.01.013
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA01 Clinical Medicine
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Biomedical Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2028 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2028 Researchers by UoA|UoA01 Clinical Medicine
dc.publisher.placeFrance
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-01-19
dc.date.updated2024-02-01T13:26:32Z
dc.rights.embargodate2024-02-03
dc.identifier.eissn1638-6183
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.biochi.2024.01.013


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV