Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLong, JC
dc.contributor.authorSarkies, MN
dc.contributor.authorFrancis-Auton, E
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, N
dc.contributor.authorHardwick, R
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, HM
dc.contributor.authorLevesque, J-F
dc.contributor.authorWatson, DE
dc.contributor.authorWestbrook, J
dc.contributor.authorHibbert, PD
dc.contributor.authorRapport, F
dc.contributor.authorBraithwaite, J
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-01T15:11:14Z
dc.date.available2023-08-01T15:11:14Z
dc.date.issued2023-06
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.othere070799
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21124
dc.description.abstract

Objective Large-scale, multisite hospital improvement initiatives can advance high-quality care for patients. Implementation support is key to adoption of change in this context. Strategies that foster collaboration within local teams, across sites and between initiative developers and users are important. However not all implementation strategies are successful in all settings, sometimes realising poor or unintended outcomes. Our objective here is to develop guiding principles for effective collaborative implementation strategies for multi-site hospital initiatives.

Design Mixed-method realist evaluation. Realist studies aim to examine the underlying theories that explain differing outcomes, identifying mechanisms and contextual factors that may trigger them.

Setting We report on collaborative strategies used in four multi-site initiatives conducted in all public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia (n>100).

Participants Using an iterative process, information was gathered on collaborative implementation strategies used, then initial programme theories hypothesised to underlie the strategies’ outcomes were surfaced using a realist dialogic approach. A realist interview schedule was developed to elicit evidence for the posited initial programme theories. Fourteen participants from 20 key informants invited participated. Interviews were conducted via Zoom, transcribed and analysed. From these data, guiding principles of fostering collaboration were developed.

Results Six guiding principles were distilled: (1) structure opportunities for collaboration across sites; (2) facilitate meetings to foster learning and problem-solving across sites; (3) broker useful long-term relationships; (4) enable support agencies to assist implementers by giving legitimacy to their efforts in the eyes of senior management; (5) consider investment in collaboration as effective well beyond the current projects; (6) promote a shared vision and build momentum for change by ensuring inclusive networks where everyone has a voice.

Conclusion Structuring and supporting collaboration in large-scale initiatives is a powerful implementation strategy if contexts described in the guiding principles are present.

dc.format.extente070799-e070799
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBMJ
dc.subjectchange management
dc.subjectquality in health care
dc.subjecthealth & safety
dc.titleGuiding principles for effective collaborative implementation strategies for multisite hospital improvement initiatives: a mixed-method realist evaluation of collaborative strategies used in four multisite initiatives at public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37286318
plymouth.issue6
plymouth.volume13
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070799
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBMJ Open
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070799
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-05-22
dc.date.updated2023-08-01T15:10:40Z
dc.rights.embargodate2023-8-2
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070799


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV