Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorElston, J
dc.contributor.authorGradinger, FP
dc.contributor.authorStreeter, AJ
dc.contributor.authorMacey, S
dc.contributor.authorMartin, S
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-25T11:15:10Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-15
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.other1038
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19574
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background </jats:title> <jats:p>This study evaluates the effectiveness of a targeted telephone-based case management service that aimed to reduce ED attendance amongst frequent attenders, known to disproportionately contribute to demand. Evidence on the effectiveness of these services varies.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>A 24-month controlled before-and-after study, following 808 patients (128 cases and 680 controls (41 were non-compliant)) who were offered the service in the first four months of operation within a UK ED department. Patients stratified as high-risk of reattending ED within 6 months by a predictive model were manually screened. Those positively reviewed were offered a non-clinical, nurse-led, telephone-based health coaching, consisting of care planning, coordination and goal setting for up to 9 months. Service effectiveness was estimated using a difference-in-differences (DiD) analysis. Incident rate of ED and Minor Injury Unit (MIU) attendances and average length of stay in intervention recipients and controls over 12 months after receiving their service offer following ED attendance were compared, adjusting for the prior 12-month period, sex and age, to give an incidence rate ratio (IRR).</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Intervention recipients were more likely to be female (63.3% versus 55.4%), younger (mean of 69 years versus 76 years), and have higher levels of ED activity (except for MIU) than controls. Mean rates fell between periods for all outcomes (except for MIU attendance). The Intention-to-Treat analysis indicated non-statistically significant effect of the intervention in reducing all outcomes, except for MIU attendances, with IRRs: ED attendances, 0.856 (95% CI: 0.631, 1.160); ED admissions, 0.871 (95% CI: 0.628, 1.208); length of stay for emergency and elective admissions: 0.844 (95% CI: 0.619, 1.151) and 0.781 (95% CI: 0.420, 1.454). MIU attendance increased with an IRR: 2.638 (95% CI: 1.041, 6.680).</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Telephone-based health coaching appears to be effective in reducing ED attendances and admissions, with shorter lengths of stay, in intervention recipients over controls. Future studies need to capture outcomes beyond acute activity, and better understand how services like this provide added value.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.format.extent1038-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.subjectFrequent attenders
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectPredictive models
dc.subjectCase management
dc.subjectTelephone-based Health coaching
dc.titleEffectiveness of a targeted telephone-based case management service on activity in an Emergency Department in the UK: a pragmatic difference-in-differences evaluation
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965330
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume22
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalBMC Health Services Research
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-022-08415-2
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA20 Social Work and Social Policy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-07-28
dc.rights.embargodate2022-8-26
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6963
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12913-022-08415-2
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-08-15
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV