Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFroghi, F
dc.contributor.authorSoggiu, F
dc.contributor.authorRicciardi, F
dc.contributor.authorVindrola-Padros, C
dc.contributor.authorFloros, L
dc.contributor.authorMartin, D
dc.contributor.authorFilipe, H
dc.contributor.authorVarcada, M
dc.contributor.authorGurusamy, K
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharya, S
dc.contributor.authorFanshawe, A
dc.contributor.authorDolcea, B
dc.contributor.authorMathur, P
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, B
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-08T06:21:49Z
dc.date.available2022-08-08T06:21:49Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-15
dc.identifier.issn0007-1323
dc.identifier.issn1365-2168
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19513
dc.descriptionMeeting Abstract P-P06
dc.description.abstract

Background: Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) reduces complications in patients undergoing major general surgery. There are no reports of cardiac output evaluation being used to optimise the fluid administration for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) in a general surgery ward.

Method: 50 patients with AP were randomised to either ward-based GDFT (n=25) with intravenous (IV) fluids administered based on stroke volume optimisation protocol or standard care (SC) (n=25), but with blinded cardiac output evaluation, for 48-hours following hospital admission. Primary outcome was feasibility.

Results: 50 of 116 eligible patients (43.1%) were recruited over 20 months demonstrating feasibility. 36 (72%) completed the 48-hours of GDFT; 10 (20%) discharged within 48-hours and 4 withdrawals (3 GDFT, 1 SC). Baseline characteristics were similar with only 3 participants having severe disease (6%, 1 GDFT, 2 SC). Similar volumes of IV fluids were administered in both groups (GDFT 5465 (1839) ml, SC 5211 (1745) ml). GDFT group had a lower heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate and improved oxygen saturations. GDFT was not associated with any harms. There was no evidence of difference in complications of AP (GDFT 24%, SC 32%) or in the duration of stay in intensive care (GDFT 0 (0), SC 0.7 (3) days). Length of hospital stay was 5 (2.9) days in GDFT and 6.3 (7.6) in SC groups.

Conclusion: Ward-based GDFT is feasible and shows a signal of possible efficacy in AP in this early-stage study. A larger multi-site RCT is required to confirm clinical and cost effectiveness.

dc.format.extent106737-106737
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.subjectFluid therapy
dc.subjectAcute pancreatitis
dc.subjectCardiac output
dc.subjectGoal -directed fluid therapy
dc.titleWard based goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in acute pancreatitis (GAP) trial: a feasibility randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN 36077283]
dc.typeconference
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000755788600286&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue9
plymouth.volume108
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106737
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106737
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA01 Clinical Medicine
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-24
dc.rights.embargodate2022-12-15
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2168
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106737
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeConference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV