Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSneyd, JR
dc.contributor.authorAbsalom, A
dc.contributor.authorBarends, C
dc.contributor.authorJones, J
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-24T21:57:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01
dc.identifier.issn0007-0912
dc.identifier.issn1471-6771
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18160
dc.description.abstract

Background. Intraoperative and post-operative hypotension occur commonly and are associated with organ injury and poor outcomes. Changes in blood pressure during procedural sedation are not well described. Methods. Individual patient data from five trials of propofol sedation for colonoscopy and a clinical database were pooled and explored with logistic and linear regression. A literature search and focussed meta-analysis compared the incidence of hypotension with propofol and alternative forms of procedural sedation. Hypotensive episodes were characterised by the original authors’ definitions, typically systolic blood pressure <90mmHg. Results. In pooled individual patient data (n=939), 36% of procedures were associated with episodes of hypotension. Longer periods of propofol sedation and larger propofol doses were associated with longer lasting and more profound hypotension. Amongst 380 patients for whom individual blood pressure measurements were available, 107 (28%) experienced systolic BP <90mmHg for >5 minutes and in 89 (23%) the episodes exceeded 10 minutes. Meta-analysis of eighteen Randomised Controlled Trials identified an increased Risk Ratio for the development of hypotension in procedures where propofol was used compared to the use of etomidate (2 studies, n=260, RR 2.0 [95% CI 1.37 – 2.92], p=0.0003), remimazolam (1 study, n=384, RR 2.15 [1.61 – 2.87], p=0.0001), midazolam (14 studies, n=2218, RR 1.46 [ 1.18 – 1.79], p=0.0004) or all benzodiazepines (15 studies, n=2602, 1.67 [1.41 – 1.98], p<0.00001). Hypotension was less likely with propofol than when dexmedetomidine was used (1 study, n=60, RR 0.24 [0.09 – 0.62], p=0.003). Conclusions. Hypotension is common during propofol sedation for colonoscopy and of a magnitude and duration associated with harm in surgical patients.

dc.format.extent610-622
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectSedation
dc.subjectEndoscopy
dc.subjectColonoscopy
dc.subjectMidazolam
dc.subjectPropofol
dc.subjectHypotension
dc.titleHypotension during propofol sedation for colonoscopy – an exploratory analysis
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeReview
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916051
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume128
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.044
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-10-17
dc.rights.embargodate2022-1-7
dc.identifier.eissn1471-6771
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionVersion of Record
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.044
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-12-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV