Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomas, F
dc.contributor.authorHansford, L
dc.contributor.authorFord, J
dc.contributor.authorWyatt, K
dc.contributor.authorMcCabe, R
dc.contributor.authorByng, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-19T11:08:28Z
dc.date.available2021-10-19T11:08:28Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-10
dc.identifier.issn2055-1045
dc.identifier.issn2055-1045
dc.identifier.other39
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18108
dc.description.abstract

Objective This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of mobile health (mHealth) technology (including wearable activity monitors and smartphone applications) for promoting physical activity (PA) and reducing sedentary behaviour (SB) in workplace settings. Methods Systematic searches were conducted in seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane library). Studies were included if mHealth was a major intervention component, PA/SB was a primary outcome, and participants were recruited and/or the intervention was delivered in the workplace. Study quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool. Interventions were coded for behaviour change techniques (BCTs) using the Coventry, Aberdeen and London – Refined (CALO-RE) taxonomy. Results Twenty-five experimental and quasi-experimental studies were included. Studies were highly heterogeneous and only one was rated as ‘strong’ methodological quality. Common BCTs included self-monitoring, feedback, goal-setting and social comparison. A total of 14/25 (56%) studies reported a significant increase in PA, and 4/10 (40%) reported a significant reduction in sedentary time; 11/16 (69%) studies reported a significant impact on secondary outcomes including reductions in weight, systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol. While overall acceptability was high, a large decline in technology use and engagement was observed over time. Conclusions While methodological quality was generally weak, there is reasonable evidence for mHealth in a workplace context as a feasible, acceptable and effective tool to promote PA. The impact in the longer term and on SB is less clear. Higher quality, mixed methods studies are needed to explore the reasons for decline in engagement with time and the longer-term potential of mHealth in workplace interventions. Protocol registration: The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42017058856

dc.format.extent39-
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan (part of Springer Nature)
dc.subjectBehavioral and Social Science
dc.subjectBasic Behavioral and Social Science
dc.subjectMental Health
dc.subjectHealth Services
dc.subjectClinical Research
dc.subjectMental health
dc.subjectGeneric health relevance
dc.subject1 No Poverty
dc.titleMoral narratives and mental health: rethinking understandings of distress and healthcare support in contexts of austerity and welfare reform
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume4
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalPalgrave Communications
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/s41599-018-0091-y
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-03-13
dc.rights.embargodate2021-10-20
dc.identifier.eissn2055-1045
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.funderEconomic and Social Research Council
rioxxterms.identifier.projectPoverty, pathology and pills: moral narratives and the medicalisation of distress
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1057/s41599-018-0091-y
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-04-10
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
plymouth.funderPoverty, pathology and pills: moral narratives and the medicalisation of distress::Economic and Social Research Council


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV