Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTromans, S
dc.contributor.authorKinney, M
dc.contributor.authorChester, V
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, R
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Ashok
dc.contributor.authorSander, JW
dc.contributor.authorDudson, H
dc.contributor.authorShankar, Rohit
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-22T19:07:32Z
dc.date.available2021-05-22T19:07:32Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.identifier.issn2056-4724
dc.identifier.issn2056-4724
dc.identifier.othere128
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17173
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec id="S2056472420001222_sec_a1"><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The approach taken to support individuals during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic needs to take into account the requirements of people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism, who represent a major vulnerable group, with higher rates of co-occurring health conditions and a greater risk of dying prematurely. To date, little evidence on COVID-related concerns have been produced and no report has provided structured feedback from the point of view of people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism or of their family/carers.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472420001222_sec_a2"><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p>To provide systemised evidence-based information of the priority concerns for people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472420001222_sec_a3" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Method</jats:title><jats:p>Senior representatives of major UK-based professional and service-user representative organisations with a stake in the care of people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism were contacted to provide a list of concerns across three domains: ‘mental health and challenging behaviour’, ‘physical health and epilepsy’ and ‘social circumstances and support’. The feedback was developed into statements on frequently reported priorities. These statements were then rated independently by expert clinicians. A video-conference meeting to reconcile outliers and to generate a consensus statement list was held.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472420001222_sec_a4" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Thirty-two organisations were contacted, of which 26 (81%) replied. From the respondent's data, 30 draft consensus statements were generated. Following expert clinician review, there was initially strong consensus for seven statements (23%), increasing to 27 statements (90%) following video conferencing.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472420001222_sec_a5" sec-type="conclusions"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>These recommendations highlight the expectations of people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism in the current pandemic. This could support policymakers and professionals’ deliver and evidence person-centred care.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extente128-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRoyal College of Psychiatrists
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectintellectual disability
dc.subjectdevelopmental disability
dc.subjectautism
dc.titlePriority concerns for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000583034400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue6
plymouth.volume6
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBJPsych Open
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/bjo.2020.122
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.identifier.eissn2056-4724
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1192/bjo.2020.122
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV