Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, K
dc.contributor.authorGangadharan, S
dc.contributor.authorBrigham, P
dc.contributor.authorSmith, E
dc.contributor.authorShankar, Rohit
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-21T22:16:31Z
dc.date.available2021-05-21T22:16:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-05
dc.identifier.issn2056-4724
dc.identifier.issn2056-4724
dc.identifier.othere102
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17163
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec id="S2056472421000582_sec_a1"> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>A significant number of people with autism require in-patient psychiatric care. Although the requirement to adequately meet the needs of people with autism in these settings is enshrined in UK law and supported by national guidelines, little information is available on current practice.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472421000582_sec_a2"> <jats:title>Aims</jats:title> <jats:p>To describe characteristics of UK in-patient psychiatric settings admitting people with autism. Also to examine psychiatric units for their suitability, and the resultant impact on admission length and restrictive interventions.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472421000582_sec_a3" sec-type="methods"> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>Multiple-choice questions about in-patient settings and their ability to meet the needs of people with autism and the impact on their outcomes were developed as a cross-sectional study co-designed with a national autism charity. The survey was distributed nationally, using an exponential and non-discriminatory snowballing technique, to in-patient unit clinicians to provide a current practice snapshot.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472421000582_sec_a4" sec-type="results"> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Eighty responses were analysed after excluding duplications, from across the UK. Significant variation between units across all enquired parameters exist. Lack of autism-related training and skills across staff groups was identified, this becoming disproportionate when comparing intellectual disability units with general mental health units particularly regarding psychiatrists working in these units (psychiatrists: 94% specialist skills in intellectual disability units versus 6% specialist skills in general mental health units). In total, 28% of survey respondents felt people with autism are more likely to be subject to seclusion and 40% believed in-patients with autism are likely to end in segregation.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472421000582_sec_a5" sec-type="conclusions"> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>There is no systematic approach to supporting people with autism who are admitted to in-patient psychiatric units. Significant concerns are highlighted of lack of professional training and skill sets resulting in variable clinical practice and care delivery underpinned by policy deficiency. This could account for the reported in-patient outcomes of longer stay and segregation experienced by people with autism.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.format.extente102-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRoyal College of Psychiatrists
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAutism
dc.subjectintellectual disability
dc.subjectdevelopmental disability
dc.subjectinpatients
dc.subjectmental health
dc.titleCurrent practice and adaptations being made for people with autism admitted to in-patient psychiatric services across the UK
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000650208800001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume7
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBJPsych Open
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/bjo.2021.58
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.identifier.eissn2056-4724
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1192/bjo.2021.58
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV