Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAxford, Nick
dc.contributor.authorBjornstad, G
dc.contributor.authorClarkson, S
dc.contributor.authorUkoumunne, O
dc.contributor.authorWrigley, Z
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, J
dc.contributor.authorBerry, V
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-09T13:58:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-02
dc.identifier.issn1389-4986
dc.identifier.issn1573-6695
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15438
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The study evaluated the implementation fidelity and effectiveness of KiVa, an evidence-based program that aims to prevent and address bullying in schools, with a particular emphasis on changing the role of bystanders. The study was a two-arm waitlist control cluster randomized controlled trial in which 22 primary schools (clusters) (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 3214 students aged 7–11) were allocated using a 1:1 ratio to intervention (KiVa; 11 clusters, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 1588 students) and a waitlist control (usual school provision; 11 clusters, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 1892 children)). The trial statistician (but not schools or researchers) remained blind to allocation status. The outcomes were as follows: student-reported victimization (primary outcome) and bullying perpetration; teacher-reported child behavior and emotional well-being; and school absenteeism (administrative records). Implementation fidelity was measured using teacher-completed online records (for class lessons) and independent researcher observations (for school-wide elements). Outcome analyses involved 11 intervention schools (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 1578 children) and 10 control schools (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 1636 children). There was no statistically significant effect on the primary outcome of child-reported victimization (adjusted intervention/control OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.06; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.11) or on the secondary outcomes. The impact on victimization was not moderated by child gender, age, or victimization status at baseline. Lesson adherence was good but exposure (lesson length) was lower than the recommended amount, and there was considerable variability in the implementation of whole school elements. The trial found insufficient evidence to conclude that KiVa had an effect on the primary outcome. A larger trial of KiVa in the UK is warranted, however, with attention to issues regarding implementation fidelity. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23999021 Date 10-6-13</jats:p>

dc.format.extent615-626
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag
dc.subjectBullying
dc.subjectPrevention
dc.subjectIntervention
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectEvidence-based intervention
dc.titleThe effectiveness of the KiVa bullying prevention program in Wales, UK: results from a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeRandomized Controlled Trial
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000523065600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue5
plymouth.volume21
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalPrevention Science
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11121-020-01103-9
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-01-30
dc.rights.embargodate2020-4-15
dc.identifier.eissn1573-6695
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s11121-020-01103-9
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-04-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV