Abstract

Two experiments examined the role of memory for behavioral episodes in judgments about in-groups and out-groups. Using a minimal group paradigm, participants read either positive or negative trait-relevant behaviors performed by group members. They then were asked to make judgments about the group's trait characteristics. Results demonstrated that for groups described positively, judgments about the out-group but not the in-group were accomplished by retrieving from memory specific behaviors performed by group members. In contrast, for groups described negatively, judgments about the in-group but not the out-group were accomplished by retrieving specific behaviors performed by group members. These results suggest that basic differences in the way judgments about in-groups and out-groups are made contribute to the establishment and perpetuation of intergroup bias by decreasing the stability of negative in-group and positive out-group impressions and increasing the stability of positive in-group and negative out-group impressions. (C) 1998 Academic Press.

DOI

10.1006/jesp.1997.1342

Publication Date

1998-01-01

Publication Title

J EXP SOC PSYCHOL

Volume

34

Issue

1

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC

ISSN

0022-1031

Embargo Period

2024-11-22

Keywords

OUT-GROUP HOMOGENEITY, IN-GROUP, SOCIAL CATEGORIZATION, GROUP VARIABILITY, TRAIT JUDGMENTS, ATTRIBUTION, SELF, REPRESENTATION, STEREOTYPES, IMPRESSIONS

First Page

51

Last Page

65

Share

COinS