ORCID
- Ganis, Giorgio: 0000-0001-6175-2618
Abstract
This article provides an overview of verbal lie detection research. This type of research began in the 1970s with examining the relationship between deception and specific words. We briefly review this initial research. In the late 1980s, Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) emerged, a veracity assessment tool containing a list of verbal criteria. This was followed by Reality Monitoring (RM) and Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN), two other veracity assessment tools that contain lists of verbal criteria. We discuss their contents, theoretical rationales, and ability to identify truths and lies. We also discuss similarities and differences between CBCA, RM, and SCAN. In the mid 2000s, ‘Interviewing to deception’ emerged, with the goal of developing specific interview protocols aimed at enhancing or eliciting verbal veracity cues. We outline the four most widely researched interview protocols to date: the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE), Verifiability Approach (VA), Cognitive Credibility Assessment (CCA), and Reality Interviewing (RI). We briefly discuss the working of these protocols, their theoretical rationales and empirical support, as well as the similarities and differences between them. We conclude this article with elaborating on how neuroscientists can inform and improve verbal lie detection.
DOI
10.3390/brainsci12121644
Publication Date
2022-11-27
Publication Title
Brain Sciences
Volume
12
Issue
12
First Page
1644
Last Page
1644
Embargo Period
2022-12-09
Organisational Unit
School of Psychology
Recommended Citation
Vrij, A., Granhag, P., Ashkenazi, T., Ganis, G., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. (2022) 'Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future', Brain Sciences, 12(12), pp. 1644-1644. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121644
