Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSambrook, TD
dc.contributor.authorGoslin, J
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-22T14:48:22Z
dc.date.available2017-09-22T14:48:22Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0033-2909
dc.identifier.issn1939-1455
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9974
dc.description.abstract

Economic approaches to decision making assume that people attach values to prospective goods and act to maximize their obtained value. Neuroeconomics strives to observe these values directly in the brain. A widely used valuation term in formal learning and decision-making models is the reward prediction error: the value of an outcome relative to its expected value. An influential theory (Holroyd & Coles, 2002) claims that an electrophysiological component, feedback related negativity (FRN), codes a reward prediction error in the human brain. Such a component should be sensitive to both the prior likelihood of reward and its magnitude on receipt. A number of studies have found the FRN to be insensitive to reward magnitude, thus questioning the Holroyd and Coles account. However, because of marked inconsistencies in how the FRN is measured, a meaningful synthesis of this evidence is highly problematic. We conducted a meta-analysis of the FRN's response to both reward magnitude and likelihood using a novel method in which published effect sizes were disregarded in favor of direct measurement of the published waveforms themselves, with these waveforms then averaged to produce "great grand averages." Under this standardized measure, the meta-analysis revealed strong effects of magnitude and likelihood on the FRN, consistent with it encoding a reward prediction error. In addition, it revealed strong main effects of reward magnitude and likelihood across much of the waveform, indicating sensitivity to unsigned prediction errors or "salience." The great grand average technique is proposed as a general method for meta-analysis of event-related potential (ERP).

dc.format.extent213-235
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA)
dc.subjectfeedback related negativity (FRN)
dc.subjectevent-related potential (ERP)
dc.subjectreward prediction error (RPE)
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectgreat grand average
dc.titleA neural reward prediction error revealed by a meta-analysis of ERPs using great grand averages.
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25495239
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume141
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000006
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalPsychological Bulletin
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/bul0000006
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 REF peer reviewers
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Brain
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.rights.embargodate2016-01-01
dc.identifier.eissn1939-1455
dc.rights.embargoperiod12 months
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1037/bul0000006
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV