Ethics and equity in research priority-setting: stakeholder engagement and the needs of disadvantaged groups
dc.contributor.author | Bhaumik, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Rana, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Karimkhani, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Welch, V | |
dc.contributor.author | Armstrong, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Pottie, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Dellavalle, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Dhakal, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Oliver, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Francis, DK | |
dc.contributor.author | Nasser, Mona | |
dc.contributor.author | Crowe, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Aksut, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Amico, RD | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-23T11:14:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-23T11:14:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-04-01 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0974-8466 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0975-5691 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9524 | |
dc.description.abstract |
A transparent and evidence-based priority-setting process promotes the optimal use of resources to improve health outcomes. Decision-makers and funders have begun to increasingly engage representatives of patients and healthcare consumers to ensure that research becomes more relevant. However, disadvantaged groups and their needs may not be integrated into the priority-setting process since they do not have a "political voice" or are unable to organise into interest groups. Equitable priority-setting methods need to balance patient needs, values, experiences with population-level issues and issues related to the health system. | |
dc.format.extent | 110-113 | |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Forum for Medical Ethics Society | |
dc.subject | Community Participation | |
dc.subject | Decision Making | |
dc.subject | Health Equity | |
dc.subject | Health Priorities | |
dc.subject | Health Services Needs and Demand | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | India | |
dc.subject | Public Health | |
dc.subject | Research | |
dc.subject | Vulnerable Populations | |
dc.title | Ethics and equity in research priority-setting: stakeholder engagement and the needs of disadvantaged groups | |
dc.type | journal-article | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
plymouth.author-url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25797432 | |
plymouth.issue | 2 | |
plymouth.volume | 12 | |
plymouth.publication-status | Published | |
plymouth.journal | Indian Journal of Medical Ethics | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.20529/ijme.2015.030 | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Admin Group - REF | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Admin Group - REF/REF Admin Group - FoH | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Health | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Dental School | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED) | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role/Academics | |
dc.publisher.place | India | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 0975-5691 | |
dc.rights.embargoperiod | No embargo | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.20529/ijme.2015.030 | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | |
plymouth.oa-location | http://ijme.in/articles/ethics-and-equity-in-research-priority-setting-stakeholder-engagement-and-the-needs-of-disadvantaged-groups/?galley=html |