Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWamba, SF
dc.contributor.authorGunasekaran, A
dc.contributor.authorAkter, S
dc.contributor.authorRen, SJ-F
dc.contributor.authorDubey, R
dc.contributor.authorChilde, SJ
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-03T10:09:38Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.identifier.issn0148-2963
dc.identifier.issn1873-7978
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5544
dc.description.abstract

Drawing on the resource-based view and the literature on big data analytics (BDA), information system (IS) success and the business value of information technology (IT), this study proposes a big data analytics capability (BDAC) model. The study extends the above research streams by examining the direct effects of BDAC on firm performance (FPER), as well as the mediating effects of process-oriented dynamic capabilities (PODC) on the relationship between BDAC and FPER. To test our proposed research model, we used an online survey to collect data from 297 Chinese IT managers and business analysts with big data and business analytic experience. The findings confirm the value of the entanglement conceptualization of the hierarchical BDAC model, which has both direct and indirect impacts on FPER. The results also confirm the strong mediating role of PODC in improving insights and enhancing FPER. Finally, implications for practice and research are discussed.

dc.format.extent356-365
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectBig data analytics
dc.subjectBig data analytics capability
dc.subjectBusiness values
dc.subjectProcess-oriented dynamic capabilities
dc.subjectFirm performance
dc.titleBig data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000388053500037&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issueC
plymouth.volume70
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Business Research
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.009
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Business School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA17 Business and Management Studies
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-08-05
dc.rights.embargodate2018-2-9
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7978
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.009
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-01-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV