Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLatimer, B
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-08T09:12:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-11T09:42:53Z
dc.date.available2015-10-08T09:12:26Z
dc.date.available2016-07-11T09:42:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0034-6551
dc.identifier.issn1471-6968
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5038
dc.description.abstract

Analysis of the religious politics of Samuel Richardson’s The History of Sir Charles Grandison (1753-4) focuses on the text’s Catholic and post-Jacobite aspects. This essay argues that there is a more immediate political context for understanding religious tolerance in the novel: the Jewish Naturalisation Act of 1753. Grandison was printed during 1753, when this controversial legislation was passed and repealed. The novel contains Richardson’s only Jewish character, Solomon Merceda, and an exploration of debate over the Act reveals similarities between the assumptions and language of the pamphlet literature, and those found in the novel. Although he began printing his text during 1753, Richardson still had opportunities during this year to revise and even to write parts of it. There is also evidence that friends who read and discussed drafts for him during this period were amongst the Act’s promoters. The essay concludes that the Act is an unacknowledged political context for this important novel that would have been part of original readers’ experience of it, and suggests that the idea of tolerance which emerges from this reading may inflect our understanding of Grandison’s representation of religious difference more generally.

dc.format.extent520-539
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.replaceshttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3581
dc.relation.replaces10026.1/3581
dc.subject47 Language, Communication and Culture
dc.subject4703 Language Studies
dc.subject4705 Literary Studies
dc.titleSamuel Richardson and the "Jew Bill" of 1753: A new political context for Sir Charles Grandison
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.issue275
plymouth.volume66
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalThe Review of English Studies
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/res/hgu112
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA27 English Language and Literature
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.identifier.eissn1471-6968
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/res/hgu112
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV