Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNatesan, K
dc.contributor.authorShah, W
dc.contributor.authorLe, H
dc.contributor.authorTredwin, C
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-13T15:12:04Z
dc.date.available2015-08-13T15:12:04Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-13
dc.identifier.issn2157-9083
dc.identifier.issn2157-9091
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3519
dc.description.abstract

Calcium Phosphate cement has been the subject of intense investigation over the past few years. This study compares difference in biocompatibility between the three main phases of Ca-P, namely Hydroxyapatite, Dicalcium phosphate and β-Tricalcium phosphate. It involves composite preparation followed by cell test. Material parameters were stoichiometry (Hydroxyapatite with Ca-P ratio of 1.67, Dicalcium phosphate with Ca-P ratio of 1.0, β-Tricalcium phosphate with Ca-P ratio of 1.50) and crystallographic structure and arrangement. The composites in concern were produced by mixing PVA (polyvinyl alcohol) and Ca-P in equal fraction. Cell test was performed for 24 h and 7 days. Biocompatibility analysis was performed both qualitatively and quantitatively. XRD, FTIR, SEM and TEM were used to analyse the materials at various stages of the research. All calcium phosphate composites were biocompatible with cells. Hydroxyapatite ceramic expressed highest biocompatibility followed by Dicalcium phosphate and β-Tricalcium phosphate after 24 h cell test, whereas, after the 7-days test biocompatibility of Dicalcium phosphate was comparable to Hydroxyapatite. This study shows that Dicalcium phosphate is a better alternative to Hydroxyapatite, where biodegradation is crucial for patients’ recovery.

dc.format.extent655-664
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Scientific Publishers
dc.subjectHydroxyapatite
dc.subjectDicalcium Phosphate
dc.subjectbeta-Tricalcium Phosphate
dc.subjectBiocompatibility
dc.subjectSol-Gel
dc.titleA critical comparison on biocompatibility of different phases of sol-gel derived calcium phosphates as bone graft materials
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000365554800006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue8
plymouth.volume5
plymouth.publication-statusAccepted
plymouth.journalJournal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1166/jbt.2015.1364
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Dental School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Marine Institute
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-07-31
dc.identifier.eissn2157-9091
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1166/jbt.2015.1364
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2015-08-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV