Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoodall, O
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-31T16:19:09Z
dc.date.available2024-01-31T16:19:09Z
dc.date.issued2023-09
dc.identifier.issn0925-4994
dc.identifier.issn1573-0751
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21984
dc.description.abstract

In response to the concept of the ‘fortress farm’ and its appropriation of traditional defensible space theory, this article introduces the conditions of undefendable rural space and the rural enterprise crime complex. Perspectives that invert traditional theory to determine contexts conducive to the incidence of rural enterprise crime. Empirical data from extensive fieldwork on crimes against wild animals in rural England is used to argue that the fortress and undefendable rural space can in effect serve to ‘design-out’ crime control and lock crime in. A dichotomous outcome, which creates a fortress for relatively powerful human insiders and a rural enterprise crime complex for persecuted non-human outsiders. A biocentric species justice perspective is adopted to counter the anthropocentric paradigm that arguably prevails in contemporary rural criminology.

dc.format.extent215-235
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectRural
dc.subjectWildlife crime
dc.subjectSpecies justice
dc.subjectPoaching
dc.titleThe rural enterprise crime complex: ‘undefendable rural space’ and the threat from the fortress farm
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000928926400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume80
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10611-023-10084-z
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalCrime, Law and Social Change
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10611-023-10084-z
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA18 Law
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business|School of Society and Culture
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2028 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2028 Researchers by UoA|UoA18 Law
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-01-25
dc.date.updated2024-01-31T16:19:09Z
dc.rights.embargodate2024-2-7
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0751
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s10611-023-10084-z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV