Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuch, W
dc.contributor.authorVylobkova, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorHeintz, Sonja
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-11T15:12:59Z
dc.date.available2024-01-11T15:12:59Z
dc.date.issued2023-10
dc.identifier.issn1614-0001
dc.identifier.issn2151-2299
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21897
dc.description.abstract

Abstract: Allport’s distinction of personality devaluated (personality) and personality evaluated (character) raised the question of whether the character is redundant with personality, which still remains open today. The present study hence compares the Five-Factor Model of personality and the VIA-classification (Values in Action) of character strengths across two methods (self- and peer-reports) and two levels of abstraction (domains/factors and scales/facets). A sample of 152 participants and 152 peer-raters completed the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised and the VIA Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS). Personality and character assessed with these inventories were found to strongly overlap, yet the different operationalizations were rarely redundant (except for three personality facets). Multitrait-multimethod analyses mostly supported the convergent and discriminant validity of personality and character. Interpersonal strengths (e.g., teamwork) and abstract character factors lacked discriminant validity to personality facets. The present investigation contributes to a better understanding of the interplay between personality and character and provides an impetus for future research on the “virtue gap” between devaluated and evaluated personality traits.

dc.format.extent263-270
dc.languageen
dc.publisherHogrefe Publishing Group
dc.subjectfive-factor model of personality
dc.subjectBig Five
dc.subjectcharacter strengths
dc.subjectvirtues
dc.subjectpersonality facets
dc.subjectpositive psychology
dc.titleTwo of a Kind or Distant Relatives?
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000999467900003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume44
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Individual Differences
dc.identifier.doi10.1027/1614-0001/a000400
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience|UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience MANUAL
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2028 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2028 Researchers by UoA|UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
dc.date.updated2024-01-11T15:12:53Z
dc.rights.embargodate2024-01-17
dc.identifier.eissn2151-2299
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1027/1614-0001/a000400


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV