Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhao, Z
dc.contributor.authorTang, Lijun
dc.contributor.authorMa, Y
dc.contributor.authorWu, Y
dc.contributor.authorLin, S
dc.contributor.authorWu, Z
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Z
dc.contributor.authorWang, X
dc.contributor.authorWang, X
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-26T14:36:57Z
dc.date.available2023-06-26T14:36:57Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-23
dc.identifier.issn1872-9460
dc.identifier.issn1872-9460
dc.identifier.other105730
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21002
dc.description.abstract

This paper examines seafarers’ experience of fatigue during and after the pandemic. A multi-phase mixed methods research design was used, including two quantitative surveys (Nduring-pandemic=501 and Nafter-pandemic=412) and 36 in-depth interviews. Applying propensity score matching the two samples to approximate the conditions of a randomized controlled experiment, the study shows that surprisingly seafarers reported higher levels of fatigue after the pandemic. Qualitative interviews with seafarers and ship managers reveal the underlying reason – the intensified ship inspection regime together with policy and regulatory updates/revisions in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic increased seafarers’ workload and made seafarers more fatigued. The results of the two surveys also show that while fatigue risk factors differed between the two periods, fatigue risk can be managed and mitigated in both periods by implementing fatigue risk management policies and practices. Policy and management implications for improving seafarers’ occupational health and safety are discussed at the end of the paper.

dc.format.extent105730-105730
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectCOVID-19 pandemic
dc.subjectFatigue
dc.subjectMixed methods
dc.subjectOccupational health and safety
dc.subjectParadox theory
dc.subjectSafety inspection
dc.titleFatigue at sea during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative study of two matched samples of seafarers
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366404
plymouth.volume155
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalMarine Policy
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105730
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA17 Business and Management Studies
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business|Plymouth Business School
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-06-15
dc.date.updated2023-06-26T14:36:56Z
dc.rights.embargodate2025-6-23
dc.identifier.eissn1872-9460
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105730


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV