Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGlynis, A
dc.contributor.authorFoschi, Federico
dc.contributor.authorKefalou, I
dc.contributor.authorKoletsi, D
dc.contributor.authorTzanetakis, GN
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-05T11:54:12Z
dc.date.available2023-05-05T11:54:12Z
dc.date.issued2021-06
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/20826
dc.description.abstract

INTRODUCTION: Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are intended to repair and regenerate part of the pulp-dentin complex. The aim of this study was to systematically appraise the existing evidence on the effectiveness of REPs on mature teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis. METHODS: Electronic database and hand searches were performed on 8 databases of published and unpublished literature from inception to January 3, 2021, for the identification of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective clinical trials. The related key words included "regenerative," "pulp revascularization," "revitalization procedure," and "necrotic mature teeth." A random effects meta-analysis was conducted assessing success as the main outcome treatment. Risk of bias was assessed through the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the quality of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Of the 337 initial hits, 4 RCTs were eligible for inclusion, whereas 3 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Overall, there was no difference in the relative risk for a successful/unsuccessful treatment outcome between REPs or conventional treatment (3 studies, relative risk = 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.15; P = .61; heterogeneity I2 = 0.0%, P = .53; prediction interval = 0.51-2.09). Risk of bias ranged from low to raising some concerns, whereas the quality of the evidence was graded as moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on moderate-quality evidence, REPs appear as a viable treatment alternative for mature necrotic teeth with periapical lesions at present. Furthermore, well-designed RCTs might also provide confirmatory evidence in this respect while also framing a backbone for standardization of the therapeutic protocol of REPs.

dc.format.extent873-882
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectApical periodontitis
dc.subjectconventional endodontic treatment
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectnecrotic mature teeth
dc.subjectregenerative endodontic procedures
dc.subjectDental Pulp Necrosis
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPeriapical Periodontitis
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subjectRegenerative Endodontics
dc.subjectRoot Canal Therapy
dc.titleRegenerative Endodontic Procedures for the Treatment of Necrotic Mature Teeth with Apical Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeMeta-Analysis
dc.typeReview
dc.typeSystematic Review
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33811981
plymouth.issue6
plymouth.volume47
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Endodontics
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2021.03.015
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|Peninsula Dental School
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-03-23
dc.date.updated2023-05-05T11:54:12Z
dc.rights.embargodate10000-01-01
dc.identifier.eissn1878-3554
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.joen.2021.03.015


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV