Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGregory, RK
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-24T14:15:08Z
dc.date.available2023-03-24T14:15:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-24
dc.identifier.issn2076-0760
dc.identifier.issn2076-0760
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/20627
dc.description.abstract

While the financial and social support afforded to United Kingdon (UK) ‘animals other than human animals’ (AOTHAs) welfare charities, such as the RSPCA and Dogs Trust, could suggest that they are valued intrinsically within Western society criminological texts largely omit them from recognition, with some important exceptions, see non-speciesist criminology. Most human animals likely do not want to directly or indirectly harm AOTHAs and even value relationships with “companion” AOTHAs. Regardless, AOTHAs have been victimized throughout history and continue to be. This article examines harm to AOTHAs in the context of the global COVID-19 pandemic to argue that abuse proliferates where harmful subjectivities are generated by society’s acceptance of (1) the anthropocentric culture, and (2) when humanity values their individual advancement within the competitive consumer culture. Companion dogs were specifically focused upon within this article due to their so called close emotional and physical proximity to human animals, with proximity meaning that they were directly impacted by the lockdown measures implemented. The coronavirus pandemic was addressed by governments throughout the world by initiating an array of social restrictions. Because of these social restrictions, millions of individuals within England, and in countries such as the United States of America (USA), decided to adopt or purchase dogs for a variety of reasons, including to help them mitigate feelings of isolation and loneliness and to provide them with an excuse to participate in outdoor exercise. In order to determine the impact that the coronavirus pandemic has had upon the plight of domesticated companion dogs within England, semi-structured interviews, document analyses, and observation research were undertaken. The initial analysis of data presented here suggests that the coronavirus pandemic threatened the wellbeing of dogs within England, with their reproductive, physical, medical, and psychological wellbeing being put at risk.

dc.format.extent195-195
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.titleAnimals Other than Human Animals and Their Claim to Equal Consideration in Coronavirus and Criminological Study: Examining Harm to Domesticated Dogs during COVID-19 in the UK
dc.typejournal-article
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume12
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalSocial Sciences
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/socsci12040195
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Post-Graduate Research Students
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business|School of Society and Culture
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-03-21
dc.date.updated2023-03-24T14:15:06Z
dc.rights.embargodate2023-3-28
dc.identifier.eissn2076-0760
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/socsci12040195


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV