Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTang, L
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-16T09:19:10Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-30
dc.identifier.issn2397-3757
dc.identifier.issn2397-3765
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19978
dc.description.abstract

Purpose This paper examines the changes suggested by maritime stakeholders to achieve gender equality in seafaring, a male-dominated profession.

Design/methodology/approach Adopting a four-stage career cycle framework, this paper analyzes changes proposed by 423 industry stakeholders to promote gender equality in seafaring. These proposed changes were posted on the Day of Seafarers 2019 virtual wall set up by the International Maritime Organization, which served as a forum for industry stakeholders from all over the world to voice their opinions and suggestions.

Findings The data analysis shows that the suggested changes reflect many challenges and barriers women seafarers face. While stakeholders from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries are more likely to call for changes to remove barriers in the retention and development stage, gender equality in seafaring in non-OECD countries is still seriously hindered by barriers in the recruitment stage. The paper also reveals that comparatively male stakeholders are less likely to appreciate the problems women seafarers face.

Originality/value This paper takes a comparative approach, comparing the changes proposed by seafarers and other industry stakeholders from different parts of the world. This approach provides a nuanced understanding of issues related to gender equality in seafaring by showing that stakeholders from different backgrounds have different priorities.

dc.format.extent255-268
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald
dc.subjectCareer cycle
dc.subjectGender equality
dc.subjectSustainable development
dc.subjectWomen seafarers
dc.titleAchieving Gender Equality in Seafaring: An analysis of Stakeholders’ Suggestions
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume8
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalMaritime Business Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/MABR-08-2022-0042
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Business School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA17 Business and Management Studies
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-11-16
dc.rights.embargodate2023-2-4
dc.identifier.eissn2397-3765
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1108/MABR-08-2022-0042
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV