Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, SLen
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Pen
dc.contributor.authorHope-Stone, Len
dc.contributor.authorDamato, Ben
dc.contributor.authorHeimann, Hen
dc.contributor.authorHussain, Ren
dc.contributor.authorCherry, MGen
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T12:40:17Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-19en
dc.identifier.issn1932-2259en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18616
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>Prognostication in cancer is growing in importance as increasingly accurate tools are developed. Prognostic accuracy intensifies ethical concerns that a poor prognosis could be psychologically harmful to survivors. Uveal melanoma (UM) prognostication allows survivors to be reliably told that life expectancy is either normal (good prognosis) or severely curtailed because of metastatic disease (poor prognosis). Treatment cannot change life expectancy. To identify whether prognosis is associated with psychological harm, we compared harm in UM survivors with good and poor prognoses and those who declined testing and compared these outcomes to general population norms.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Non-randomized 5-year study of a consecutive series of 708 UM survivors (51.6% male, mean age 69.03, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic>=12.12) with observations at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. We operationalized psychological harm as anxiety and depression symptoms, worry about cancer recurrence (WREC) and poor quality of life (QoL).</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Compared to other groups, survivors with poor prognoses showed initially elevated anxiety and depression and consistently elevated worry about local or distant recurrence over 5 years. Good prognoses were not associated with outcomes. Generally, no prognostic groups reported anxiety, depression and WREC or QoL scores that exceeded general population norms.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Using a large sample, we found that harm accruing from a poor prognosis was statistically significant over 5 years, but did not exceed general non-cancer population norms.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Implications for Cancer Survivors</jats:title> <jats:p>Survivors desire prognostic information. At a population level, we do not believe that our findings show sufficiently strong links between prognostication outcome and psychological harm to deny patients the option of knowing their prognosis. Nonetheless, it is important that patients are informed of potential adverse psychological consequences of a poor prognosis.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

en
dc.languageenen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen
dc.titleIs accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivorsen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.journalJournal of Cancer Survivorshipen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11764-021-01036-4en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-03-26en
dc.rights.embargodate2022-01-27en
dc.identifier.eissn1932-2267en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s11764-021-01036-4en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-04-19en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV