Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhitehead, K
dc.contributor.authorParkin, Tracey
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-14T08:24:43Z
dc.date.available2021-04-14T08:24:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-07
dc.identifier.issn0952-3871
dc.identifier.issn1365-277X
dc.identifier.otherjhn.12903
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17042
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>In 2007, a survey of UK dietitians identified that dietitians were positive about the use of Communication Skills for Behaviour Change (CSBC) in practice, although barriers to the implementation of skills were acknowledged. This follow‐up survey aimed to explore current perceptions of CSBC and compare them with the previous survey.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>A cross‐sectional online survey of British Dietetic Association (BDA) members’ views of CSBC was undertaken. The results for full members are presented. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data were subject to either content, or inductive thematic analysis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>A response rate of 9.4% (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 729) was achieved. Respondents were predominately female (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 684; 95.1%) and worked in the National Health Service (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 634; 87.4%). They were positive about the importance of CSBC in practice (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 714; 99.5%). Pre‐registration training had been completed by 346 respondents (48.7%).</jats:p><jats:p>Post‐registration training had been undertaken by 520 (74.7%) respondents and 514 of these (99.6%) had implemented training into practice, with few barriers identified. Perception of ability to use skills had increased, with 513 (83.6%) respondents rating their skills as excellent/very good compared to 62% previously. The majority (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 594; 93.7%) reported that post‐registration training was necessary, with the need for skills to be regularly reviewed (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 456; 74.5%), and 235 (51.9%) respondents suggested this be mandatory. By contrast, some suggested that a skill review was not a priority, and would be difficult to administer and stressful.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Perception of the importance of CSBC remains high. Although the perceived ability to apply CSBC has increased, the perceived need for post‐registration training is high, with respondents’ favouring mandatory training.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent112-123
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectbehaviour change
dc.subjectcommunication skills
dc.subjectcross&#8208
dc.subjectsectional survey
dc.subjectdietetics
dc.subjecttraining
dc.titleUK Dietitians’ views on Communication Skills for Behaviour Change: A 10 year follow up survey
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000649415300001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume35
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jhn.12903
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Health Professions
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-03-29
dc.rights.embargodate2022-4-7
dc.identifier.eissn1365-277X
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jhn.12903
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-04-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV