Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLoughlin, Een
dc.contributor.authorSyska, Aen
dc.contributor.authorSedghi, Gen
dc.contributor.authorHowell-Richardson, Cen
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-22T14:09:10Z
dc.date.available2020-12-22T14:09:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-16en
dc.identifier.other0en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16768
dc.descriptionNo embargo required.en
dc.description.abstract

<jats:p>Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they do, however, agree on the need for a robust peer review process as a crucial means to judge the merits of potential publications. While fraught with issues and inefficiencies, a critical and supportive peer review is not only what editors rely on when assessing scholarship presented for publication but also what authors hope for in order to improve their work. Understanding how peer review may best serve all parties involved: authors, editors, and reviewers, is thus at the heart of this article. The analysis offered here is based on a session the Journal for Learning Development in Higher Education editors gave at the 2020 LD@3 seminar series, entitled ‘The Art of Reviewing’. It explores the different aspects of the peer review process while formulating recommendations regarding best practices and outlining JLDHE initiatives for supporting reviewers’ vital work.</jats:p>

en
dc.format.extent0 - 0en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAssociation for Learning Development in Higher Educationen
dc.titleOn peer reviewing: how to nourish an author’s mind and win a JLDHE editor’s hearten
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue19en
plymouth.volume0en
plymouth.journalJournal of Learning Development in Higher Educationen
dc.identifier.doi10.47408/jldhe.vi19.626en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/School of Humanities and Performing Arts
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-05en
dc.rights.embargodate2021-01-21en
dc.identifier.eissn1759-667Xen
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.47408/jldhe.vi19.626en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-12-16en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV