Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHolden, Pen
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-07T16:48:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-12en
dc.identifier.issn1815-347Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15848
dc.description.abstract

There have always been tensions within the EU’s external development policy between ethical and self-interested approaches and also between universalist and realpolitik policies. The EU’s structural economic power and global neoliberal dominance have allowed these tensions to be subsumed within its external policies. A range of factors has contributed to the rise of illiberalism globally, leading to heightened geoeconomic rivalry while complex changes in global development governance facilitate the use of aid as an instrument of political and economic self-interest. The EU has reacted to this by re-framing its political approach and policies in an effort to rebalance values and interests. A new realism entered EU discourse and there is evidence of this being applied in specific instruments and policies analysed here. Blended finance instruments are ‘dual use’ in that they can be used for more flexible development policies but also to support EU businesses more directly. The proposal to combine nearly all of the previous aid and cooperation instruments into one single legal instrument will also give the EU unprecedented flexibility to use aid funds for various political purposes. These changes are part of a more complex iterative process in the case of the EU than for other international actors. Interests and values are being reconfigured rather than jettisoned in a ‘realist turn’. However, they still represent a significant adjustment for the EU in terms of aid priorities and modalities.

en
dc.format.extent101 - 119en
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherUACESen
dc.subjectilliberalism, geoeconomics, development, framingen
dc.titleIrreconcilable tensions? The EU’s development policy in an era of global illiberalismen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue2en
plymouth.volume16en
plymouth.journalJournal of Contemporary European Researchen
dc.identifier.doi10.30950/jcer.v16i2.1073en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/School of Law, Criminology and Government
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA20 Social Work and Social Policy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-06-02en
dc.rights.embargodate2020-08-11en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.30950/jcer.v16i2.1073en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-06-12en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV