Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCaughey, Sen
dc.contributor.authorFalbén, JKen
dc.contributor.authorTsamadi, Den
dc.contributor.authorPersson, LMen
dc.contributor.authorGolubickis, Men
dc.contributor.authorNeil Macrae, Cen
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-07T11:33:55Z
dc.date.available2020-04-07T11:33:55Z
dc.date.issued2021-03en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15533
dc.description.abstract

An emerging literature has suggested that self-relevance automatically enhances stimulus processing (i.e., the self-prioritization effect). Specifically, during shape-label matching tasks, geometric shapes associated with the self are identified more rapidly than comparable stimuli paired with other targets (e.g., friend, stranger). Replicating and extending work that challenges the putative automaticity of this effect, here we hypothesized that self-relevance facilitates stimulus processing only when task sets draw attention to previously formed shape-label associations in memory. The results of a shape-classification task confirmed this prediction. Compared to shapes associated with a friend, those paired with the self were classified more rapidly when participants were required to report who the stimulus denoted (i.e., self or friend). In contrast, self-relevance failed to facilitate performance when participants judged either what the shape was (i.e., triangle or square, diamond or circle) or where it was located on the screen (i.e., above or below fixation). These findings further elucidate the conditions under which self-relevance does-and does not-influence stimulus processing.

en
dc.format.extent503 - 508en
dc.languageengen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAuditory Perceptionen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectPsychomotor Performanceen
dc.subjectRecognition, Psychologyen
dc.subjectSelf Concepten
dc.subjectSocial Perceptionen
dc.subjectYoung Adulten
dc.titleSelf-prioritization during stimulus processing is not obligatory.en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31919569en
plymouth.issue2en
plymouth.volume85en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalPsychol Resen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00426-019-01283-2en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience MANUAL
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeGermanyen
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-12-23en
dc.rights.embargodate9999-12-31en
dc.identifier.eissn1430-2772en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s00426-019-01283-2en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-03en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV