Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSambrook, TD
dc.contributor.authorRoser, ME
dc.contributor.authorGoslin, Jeremy
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-12T14:36:41Z
dc.date.available2019-07-12T14:36:41Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-01
dc.identifier.issn0048-5772
dc.identifier.issn1540-5958
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14634
dc.description.abstract

Humans handle uncertainty poorly. Prospect theory accounts for this with a value function in which possible losses are overweighted compared to possible gains, and the marginal utility of rewards decreases with size. fMRI studies have explored the neural basis of this value function. A separate body of research claims that prediction errors are calculated by midbrain dopamine neurons. We investigated whether the prospect theoretic effects shown in behavioral and fMRI studies were present in midbrain prediction error coding by using the feedback-related negativity, an ERP component believed to reflect midbrain prediction errors. Participants' stated satisfaction with outcomes followed prospect theory but their feedback-related negativity did not, instead showing no effect of marginal utility and greater sensitivity to potential gains than losses.

dc.format.extent1533-1544
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectFeedback negativity
dc.subjectProspect theory
dc.subjectERP
dc.subjectFRN
dc.subjectP300
dc.subjectDopamine
dc.titleProspect theory does not describe the feedback-related negativity value function.
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23094592
plymouth.issue12
plymouth.volume49
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalPsychophysiology
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01482.x
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 REF peer reviewers
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Brain
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-08-28
dc.identifier.eissn1540-5958
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01482.x
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV