Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWheat, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorHorrell, J
dc.contributor.authorValderas, JM
dc.contributor.authorClose, James
dc.contributor.authorFosh, B
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, Helen
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-04T11:16:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.identifier.issn1477-7525
dc.identifier.issn1477-7525
dc.identifier.other223
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12976
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: To ascertain whether person centred coordinated care (P3C) is being delivered in healthcare services, components relating to the construct need to be measured. Patient reported measures (PRMs) can be used to provide a measurement of patients' experiences of P3C. Traditionally, they have been used to assess whether interventions are delivering P3C. Recently there has been an increased interest in using them to directly enhance P3C in clinical practice by, for example, improving practitioner-patient communication. However, there is limited research available on how P3C can be implemented in practice. This study aimed to extend this literature base by exploring how professionals use PRMs to enhance P3C. METHODS: Cross sectional thematic analysis of 26 semi-structured interviews with a variety of professionals who have experience of how PRMs can be used to make improvements to P3C. Inductive themes were mapped onto components of P3C care that fell under five established domains of P3C (Information and Communication; My Goals/Outcomes; Decision making; Care Planning and Transitions) to explore whether and how individual components of P3C were being improved through PRMs. Barriers and facilitators that affected the delivery and the results of the PRMs were also identified. RESULTS: Three P3C domains (Information and Communication, My Goals/Outcomes and Care Planning) were mapped frequently onto themes generated by the participants' interviews about PRM use. However, the domain 'Decision Making' was only mapped onto one theme and 'Transitions' was not mapped at all. Participant reports suggested that PRM use by practitioners enhanced patients' ability to self-manage, communicate, engage and reflect during consultations. Barriers to PRM use were related to a lack of a whole service approach to implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners use both PROMs and PREMs in various ways to improve different aspects of patient care. By sharing experiences professionals can benefit from each other's learning and work together to extend the potential value that PRMs can offer to P3C delivery.

dc.format.extent223-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectPerson centred coordinated care
dc.subjectPatient reported measures
dc.subjectPractitioner
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectgoals
dc.subjectdecision-making
dc.subjectCare planning
dc.subjecttransitions
dc.subjectclinical practice
dc.titleCan practitioners use patient reported measures to enhance person centred coordinated care in practice? A qualitative study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJOUR
plymouth.author-urlhttps://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12955-018-1045-1
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume16
plymouth.publisher-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278027/pdf/12955_2018_Article_1045.pdf
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12955-018-1045-1
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-11-06
dc.identifier.eissn1477-7525
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12955-018-1045-1
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
plymouth.funderMetrics for Person Centred Care: A knowledge Portfolio, Policy and Commissioners Guide::National Health Service for England


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV