Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrandchamp, Ren
dc.contributor.authorBraboszcz, Cen
dc.contributor.authorDelorme, Aen
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-13T15:15:43Z
dc.date.available2018-08-13T15:15:43Z
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12120
dc.description.abstract

A significant body of literature supports the contention that pupil size varies depending on cognitive load, affective state, and level of drowsiness. Here we assessed whether oculometric measures such as gaze position, blink frequency and pupil size were correlated with the occurrence and time course of self-reported mind-wandering episodes. We recorded the pupil size of two subjects engaged in a monotonous breath counting task while keeping their eyes on a fixation cross. This task is conducive to producing mind-wandering episodes. Each subject performed ten 20-min sessions, for total duration of about 4 h. Subjects were instructed to report spontaneous mind-wandering episodes by pressing a button when they lost count of their breath. After each button press, subjects filled in a short questionnaire describing the characteristics of their mind-wandering episode. We observed larger pupil size during the breath-focusing period compared to the mind-wandering period (p < 0.01 for both subjects). Our findings contradict previous research showing a higher baseline pupil size during mind wandering episodes in visual tasks. We discuss possible explanations for this discrepancy. We also analyzed nine other oculometric measures including blink rate, blink duration and gaze position. We built a support vector machine (SVM) classifier and showed that mean pupil size was the most reliable predictor of mind wandering in both subjects. The classification accuracy of mind wandering data segments vs. breath-focusing data segments was 81% for the first subject and 77% for the second subject. Additionally, we analyzed oculometric measures in light of the phenomenological data collected in the questionnaires. We showed that how well subjects remembered their thoughts while mind wandering was positively correlated with pupil size (subject 1, p < 0.001; subject 2, p < 0.05). Feelings of well being were also positively correlated with pupil size (subject 1, p < 0.001; subject 2, p < 0.001). Our results suggest that oculometric data could be used as a neurocognitive marker of mind-wandering episodes.

en
dc.format.extent31 - ?en
dc.languageengen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectblinksen
dc.subjectclassificationen
dc.subjectgaze positionen
dc.subjectmind wanderingen
dc.subjectpupil sizeen
dc.titleOculometric variations during mind wandering.en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24575056en
plymouth.volume5en
plymouth.publication-statusPublished onlineen
plymouth.journalFront Psycholen
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00031en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerlanden
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-01-10en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00031en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2014en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV