Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuploh, Ten
dc.contributor.authorBischof, HJen
dc.contributor.authorvon Engelhardt, Nen
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-16T14:58:53Z
dc.date.available2018-02-16T14:58:53Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en
dc.identifier.issn0340-5443en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10801
dc.description.abstract

Group-living animals rely on social skills which ensure beneficial interaction and prevent harmful ones with conspecifics. In a previous experiment, we demonstrated that male zebra finches reared in groups during adolescence show consistently less courtship and aggressive behaviour as adults than pair-reared males. Here we tested whether such differences affect how they group with conspecifics, as an indicator of their social integration. Zebra finches were kept in pairs (male-female or male-male) or mixed-sex groups (three males and three females) during adolescence and were introduced to an established group of unknown conspecifics during adulthood. Male courtship and aggressive behaviour were quantified directly after introduction to the group and 48 h later. At the same time, male position in relation to other birds and the number of birds in proximity were recorded. Males that grew up in a small mixed-sex group during adolescence spent more time within groups, were observed in bigger groups and lost less weight than males raised in pairs, indicating that an enriched social environment during early development may facilitate social integration. However, we observed no differences in courtship and aggressive behaviour that could predict the differences in grouping behaviour of pair- and group-reared males. We discuss alternative explanations for the difference in grouping and how to test these in future research. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

en
dc.format.extent537 - 549en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleSocial experience during adolescence influences how male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) group with conspecificsen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue4en
plymouth.volume68en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00265-013-1668-5en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/00 Groups by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/00 Groups by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health and Human Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health and Human Sciences/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s00265-013-1668-5en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV