Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarnes, AJ
dc.contributor.authorHanoch, Y
dc.contributor.authorMartynenko, M
dc.contributor.authorWood, S
dc.contributor.authorRice, T
dc.contributor.authorFederman, AD
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-05T10:14:38Z
dc.date.available2017-10-05T10:14:38Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherARTN e77096
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10009
dc.description.abstract

Many patients expect their doctor to help them choose a Medicare prescription drug plan. Whether the size of the choice set affects clinicians' decision processes and strategy selection, and the quality of their choice, as it does their older patients, is an important question with serious financial consequences. Seventy medical students and internal medicine residents completed a within-subject design using Mouselab, a computer program that allows the information-acquisition process to be examined. We examined highly numerate physician trainees' decision processes, strategy, and their ability to pick the cheapest drug plan-as price was deemed the most important factor in Medicare beneficiaries' plan choice-from either 3 or 9 drug plans. Before adjustment, participants were significantly more likely to identify the lowest cost plan when facing three versus nine choices (67.3% vs. 32.8%, p<0.01) and paid significantly less in excess premiums ($60.00 vs. $128.51, p<0.01). Compared to the three-plan condition, in the nine-plan condition participants spent significantly less time acquiring information on each attribute (p<0.05) and were more likely to employ decision strategies focusing on comparing alternate plans across a single attribute (search pattern, p<0.05). After adjusting for decision process and strategy, numeracy, and amount of medical training, the odds were 10.75 times higher that trainees would choose the lowest cost Medicare Part D drug plan when facing 3 versus 9 drug plans (p<0.05). Although employing more efficient search strategies in the complex choice environment, physician trainees experienced similar difficulty in choosing the lowest cost prescription drug plans as older patients do. Our results add further evidence that simplifications to the Medicare Part D decision environment are needed and suggest physicians' role in their patients' Part D choices may be most productive when assisting seniors with forecasting their expected medication needs and then referring them to the Medicare website or helpline.

dc.format.extente77096-e77096
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectDecision Making
dc.subjectElectronic Data Processing
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMedicare Part D
dc.subjectPhysicians
dc.subjectSoftware
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titlePhysician Trainees’ Decision Making and Information Processing: Choice Size and Medicare Part D
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24116209
plymouth.issue10
plymouth.volume8
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalPLoS ONE
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0077096
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Behaviour
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-08-30
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1371/journal.pone.0077096
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2013
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV