ORCID
- Upton, Mathew: 0000-0003-4287-6396
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ureters are fundamental for keeping kidneys free from uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC), but we have shown that 2 strains (J96 and 536) can subvert this role and reduce ureteric contractility. To determine whether this is (1) a widespread feature of UPEC, (2) exhibited only by UPEC, and (3) dependent upon type 1 fimbriae, we analyzed strains representing epidemiologically important multilocus sequence types ST131, ST73, and ST95 and non-UPEC E. coli. METHODS: Contractility and calcium transients in intact rat ureters were compared between strains. Mannose and fim mutants were used to investigate the role of type 1 fimbriae. RESULTS: Non-UPEC had no significant effect on contractility, with a mean decrease after 8 hours of 8.8%, compared with 8.8% in controls. UPEC effects on contractility were strain specific, with decreases from 9.47% to 96.7%. Mannose inhibited the effects of the most potent strains (CFT073 and UTI89) but had variable effects among other UPEC strains. Mutation and complementation studies showed that the effects of the UTI89 cystitis isolate were fimH dependent. CONCLUSIONS: We find that (1) non-UPEC do not affect ureteric contractility, (2) impairment of contractility is a common feature of UPEC, and (3) the mechanism varies between strains, but for the most potent UPEC type 1 fimbriae are involved.
DOI
10.1093/infdis/jis554
Publication Date
2012-11-15
Publication Title
J Infect Dis
Volume
206
Issue
10
Organisational Unit
School of Biomedical Sciences
Keywords
Agglutination, Animals, Female, Fimbriae, Bacterial, Gene Expression Regulation, Methylmannosides, Muscle Contraction, Mutation, Rats, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Time Factors, Ureter, Uropathogenic Escherichia coli
First Page
1589
Last Page
1596
Recommended Citation
Floyd, R. V., Upton, M., Hultgren, S., Wray, S., Burdyga, T., & Winstanley, C. (2012) 'Escherichia coli-mediated impairment of ureteric contractility is uropathogenic E. coli specific.', J Infect Dis, 206(10), pp. 1589-1596. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis554