ORCID
- Matthias E Futschik: 0000-0002-6245-8071
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rapid identification of individuals with acute respiratory infections is crucial for preventing nosocomial infections. For rapid diagnosis, especially in EDs, lateral flow devices (LFDs) are a convenient, inexpensive option with a rapid turnaround. Several 'multiplex' LFDs (M-LFDs) now exist, testing for multiple pathogens from a single swab sample. We evaluated the real-world performance of M-LFD versus PCR testing in detecting influenza A, B and SARS-CoV-2) in the ED setting.
METHODS: After preliminary evaluation of an M-LFD (SureScreen) with laboratory-grown virus and PCR-negative clinical samples, it was evaluated in a real-world setting at the ED of St Thomas' Hospital (London, UK) from 1 December 2022 to 21 April 2023. Eligible participants were ≥18 years of age, admitted with respiratory symptoms and received concurrent M-LFD and PCR tests. Main endpoints were sensitivity to detect influenza A/B (primary) and SARS-CoV-2 (secondary) versus PCR. The probability of a true positive in relation to viral concentration (expressed as PCR cycle threshold (Ct)) was analysed using logistic regression.
RESULTS: In total, 808 symptomatic participants were included (49.8% female; mean age 46.9 years). Test sensitivity (95% CI) was 67.0% (56.9% to 76.1%) for influenza A (n=100), 94.1% (71.3% to 99.9%) for influenza B (n=17) and 48.2% (39.7% to 56.8%) for SARS-CoV-2 (n=141). Sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 was significantly lower than that for influenza A and B (p=0.0057 and p=0.00088, respectively). The probability of a true positive was 98% for Ct<25 for influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 (influenza B non-evaluable). No co-infections were identified by PCR or M-LFD.
CONCLUSION: The real-world performance of SureScreen M-LFD was consistent with laboratory evaluation and achieved a high sensitivity for individuals with high viral concentration, most likely to be infectious. Given the representative UK population sample, results could be generalised for use in other settings.
DOI Link
Publication Date
2025-01-01
Publication Title
Emerg Med J
Volume
42
Issue
2
Acceptance Date
2024-11-07
Deposit Date
2026-04-20
Keywords
Humans, Influenza, Human/diagnosis, Female, Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Middle Aged, COVID-19/diagnosis, SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification, United Kingdom, Adult, Influenza B virus/isolation & purification, Influenza A virus/isolation & purification, Aged
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
First Page
98
Last Page
104
Recommended Citation
Batra, R., Blandford, E., Kulasegaran-Shylini, R., Futschik, M., Bown, A., Catton, M., Conti-Frith, H., Alexandridou, A., Gill, R., Milroy, C., Harper, S., Gettings, H., Noronha, M., Harrison, H., Douthwaite, S., Nebbia, G., Klapper, P., Tunkel, S., Vipond, R., Hopkins, S., & Fowler, T. (2025) 'Multiplex lateral flow test sensitivity and specificity in detecting influenza A, B and SARS-CoV-2 in adult patients in a UK emergency department', Emerg Med J, 42(2), pp. 98-104. Available at: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214177
