The Plymouth Student Scientist
Document Type
Psychology Article
Abstract
Organisational culture is widely acknowledged as a critical determinant of performance and employee engagement, yet debates persist regarding how best to conceptualise and measure it. This study examines the construct validity of two widely used diagnostic tools: the Competing Values Framework (CVF) and the Organisational Culture Inventory (OCI). While the CVF has achieved broad application across sectors, questions remain regarding its empirical grounding and cross-cultural relevance. Using a quantitative, cross-sectional design, this research investigates the degree of convergence between CVF and OCI dimensions within a diverse UK-based sample spanning multiple industries and job levels. In addition, it incorporates three underexplored cultural dimensions: organisational belongingness, mastery, and intrinsic motivation, to enhance understanding of psychological factors within culture assessments. Findings reveal both significant alignments and discrepancies between the two frameworks, suggesting partial overlap in the constructs they measure. Notably, Clan and Adhocracy cultures (CVF) showed strong positive associations with Constructive norms (OCI), while Market culture correlated with Aggressive/Defensive norms. Furthermore, the study identifies meaningful differences in cultural perceptions across job levels, with senior employees reporting more favourable assessments of Adhocracy and Market cultures. These results support the continued use of both models while highlighting the need for context-sensitive application and further psychometric refinement. Implications for organisational diagnosis and culture change initiatives are discussed.
Publication Date
2025-12
Publication Title
The Plymouth Student Scientist
Volume
18
Issue
2
ISSN
1754-2383
Deposit Date
2025-12
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Mistry, Jesina
(2025)
"Examining the correlation between the Competing Values Framework and other scales of measure,"
The Plymouth Student Scientist: Vol. 18:
Iss.
2, Article 17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70156/1754-2383.1525
Available at:
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/tpss/vol18/iss2/17
Supplementary file
