The Plymouth Student Scientist
Document Type
Psychology Article
Abstract
Previous research has found that when the news media reports on demonstrations, protest groups can be subject to delegitimising coverage. This body of research can be subsumed under Chan & Lee’s “protest paradigm” and is believed to consist of a set of narrative frames that journalists default to in the coverage of protests. Recent research demonstrates how the use of these framing devices may be in decline and advocates for a more integrated approach to protest coverage. However, there is little research that uses analytic frameworks specifically theorised to explore media framing. This study uses Giles and Shaw’s media framing analysis in conjunction with Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis to explore the use of media frames in coverage of Just Stop Oil protests. The data set includes 22 UK online news articles from 6 UK news publishers. The results of this analysis showed that a large portion of the articles employed delegitimising frames in the coverage of Just Stop Oil Protests. However, a portion of articles have also demonstrated legitimising coverage, either exclusively, or in tandem with delegitimising frames.
Publication Date
2025-08-30
Publication Title
The Plymouth Student Scientist
Volume
18
Issue
1
ISSN
1754-2383
Deposit Date
2025-07-28
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Handy, Holly
(2025)
"A qualitative analysis of how Just Stop Oil protests are framed in the UK online news media,"
The Plymouth Student Scientist: Vol. 18:
Iss.
1, Article 5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70156/1754-2383.1509
Available at:
https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/tpss/vol18/iss1/5
Supplementary file
