Responsibility for carbon emissions in supply chains: Actions to avoid double-counting and under-reporting.
ORCID
- Stephen Childe: 0000-0002-9476-4209
- John Summerscales: 0000-0002-3557-0404
Abstract
To effectively quantify Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and mitigate climate change, corporate carbon accounting approaches have been shaped by international organisations such as ISO and the GHG Protocol, and widely adopted by businesses. However, many studies raised concerns about the lack of comparability and limited accountability of many carbon disclosures. This paper addresses the practical challenges faced by businesses in GHG emissions reporting, such as double-counting and under-reporting, particularly in the supply chain emissions, Scope 3, context. Through a survey and semi-structured interviews with sustainability experts, this paper initiates a discussion for future GHG accounting. Consecutively, it proposes future directions for decision-makers as potential solution approaches, including standardised boundary and methodology, unified emission allocation scheme, strengthened supply chain cooperation, and government intervention. The paper also outlines a call for future research.
DOI Link
Publication Date
2026-06-02
Publication Title
Environmental Management
Volume
76
Issue
6
ISSN
0364-152X
Acceptance Date
2026-05-15
Deposit Date
2026-05-15
Embargo Period
2027-06-02
Funding
This work was funded by Innovate UK under a Knowledge Transfer Partnership programme (KTP No. 10063878).
Additional Links
Keywords
Corporate carbon accounting, Scope 3 emissions, Indirect emissions, Supply chain sustainability, Greenhouse gas
Recommended Citation
Halat, K., Childe, S., Summerscales, J., & Golding, N. (2026) 'Responsibility for carbon emissions in supply chains: Actions to avoid double-counting and under-reporting.', Environmental Management, 76(6). Available at: 10.1007/s00267-026-02521-1
