Abstract
Although self-relevance is widely acknowledged to enhance stimulus processing, the exclusivity of this effect remains open to question. In particular, in commonly adopted experimental paradigms, the prioritisation of self-relevant (vs. other-relevant) material may reflect the operation of a task-specific strategy rather than an obligatory facet of social-cognitive functioning. By changing basic aspects of the decisional context, it may therefore be possible to generate stimulus-prioritisation effects for targets other than the self. Based on the demonstration that ownership facilitates object categorisation (i.e., self-ownership effect), here we showed that stimulus prioritisation is sensitive to prior expectations about the prevalence of forthcoming objects (owned-by-self vs. owned-by-friend) and whether these beliefs are supported during the task. Under conditions of stimulus uncertainty (i.e., no prior beliefs), replicating previous research, objects were classified more rapidly when owned-by-self compared with owned-by-friend (Experiment 1). When, however, the frequency of stimulus presentation either confirmed (Experiment 2) or disconfirmed (Experiment 3) prior expectations, stimulus prioritisation was observed for the most prevalent objects regardless of their owner. A hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) analysis further revealed that decisional bias was underpinned by differences in the evidential requirements of response generation. These findings underscore the flexibility of ownership effects (i.e., stimulus prioritisation) during object processing.
DOI
10.1177/1747021820913016
Publication Date
2020-04-15
Publication Title
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
ISSN
1747-0226
Embargo Period
2024-11-22
First Page
174702182091301
Last Page
174702182091301
Recommended Citation
Falbén, J., Golubickis, M., Wischerath, D., Tsamadi, D., & et al. (2020) 'It’s not always about me: The effects of prior beliefs and stimulus prevalence on self–other prioritisation', Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, , pp. 174702182091301-174702182091301. SAGE Publications: Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820913016