Abstract
Action observation is central to human social interaction. It allows people to derive what mental states drive others' behaviour and coordinate (and compete) effectively with them. Although previous accounts have conceptualised this ability in terms of bottom‐up (motoric or conceptual) matching processes, more recent evidence suggests that such mechanisms cannot account for the complexity and uncertainty of the sensory input, even in cases where computations should be much simpler (i.e., low‐level vision). It has therefore been argued that perception in general, and social perception in particular, is better described as a process of top–down hypothesis testing. In such models, any assumption about others—their goals, attitudes, and beliefs—is translated into predictions of expected sensory input and compared with incoming stimulation. This allows perception and action to be based on these expectations or—in case of a mismatch—for one's prior assumptions to be revised until they are better aligned with the individual's behaviour. This article will give a (selective) review of recent research from experimental psychology and (social) neuroscience that supports such views, discuss the relevant underlying models, and current gaps in research. In particular, it will argue that much headway can be made when current research on predictive social perception is integrated with classic findings from social psychology, which have already shown striking effects of prior knowledge on the processing of other people's behaviour.
DOI
10.1111/spc3.12312
Publication Date
2017-07-01
Publication Title
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Volume
11
Issue
7
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
1751-9004
Embargo Period
2024-11-22
Recommended Citation
Bach, P., & Schenke, K. (2017) 'Predictive social perception: Towards a unifying framework from action observation to person knowledge', Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(7). Wiley: Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12312
