ORCID
- Mitchell, Christopher: 0000-0002-6793-5236
Abstract
Much of contemporary associative learning research is focused on understanding how and when the associative history of cues affects later learning about those cues. Very little work has investigated the effects of the associative history of outcomes on human learning. Three experiments extended the "learned irrelevance" paradigm from the animal conditioning literature to examine the influence of an outcome's prior predictability on subsequent learning of relationships between cues and that outcome. All 3 experiments found evidence for the idea that learning is biased by the prior predictability of the outcome. Previously predictable outcomes were readily associated with novel predictive cues, whereas previously unpredictable outcomes were more readily associated with novel nonpredictive cues. This finding highlights the importance of considering the associative history of outcomes, as well as cues, when interpreting multistage designs. Associative and cognitive explanations of this certainty matching effect are discussed.
DOI
10.1037/xan0000042
Publication Date
2015-01-01
Publication Title
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn
Volume
41
Issue
1
First Page
1
Last Page
17
Organisational Unit
School of Psychology
Keywords
Analysis of Variance, Association Learning, Attention, Bias, Cues, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Likelihood Functions, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Students, Universities
Recommended Citation
Griffiths, O., Mitchell, C., Bethmont, A., & Lovibond, P. (2015) 'Outcome predictability biases learning.', J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn, 41(1), pp. 1-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000042
