Authors

Michael C. Frank, Stanford University
Katherine Jane Alcock, Lancaster University
Natalia Arias-Trejo, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Gisa Aschersleben, Saarland University
Dare Baldwin, University of Oregon
Stéphanie Barbu, Université de Rennes
Elika Bergelson, Duke University
Christina Bergmann, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Alexis K. Black, Haskins Laboratories
Ryan Blything, University of Bristol
Maximilian P. Böhland, Technische Universität Dresden
Petra Bolitho, Victoria University of Wellington
Arielle Borovsky, Purdue University
Shannon M. Brady, University of California at Los Angeles
Bettina Braun, University of Konstanz
Anna Brown, University of Liverpool
Krista Byers-Heinlein, Concordia University
Linda E. Campbell, University of Newcastle
Cara Cashon, University of Louisville
Mihye Choi, University of Massachusetts Boston
Joan Christodoulou, University of California at Los Angeles
Laura K. Cirelli, University of Toronto
Stefania Conte, University of Milan - Bicocca
Sara Cordes, Boston College
Christopher Cox, University of York
Alejandrina Cristia, Université PSL
Rhodri Cusack, Trinity College Dublin
Catherine Davies, University of Leeds
Klerk M de
Luche C Delle
LD Ruiter
Dhanya Dinakar
Kate C. Dixon
Virginie Durier
Samantha Durrant
Christopher Fennell
Brock Ferguson
Alissa Ferry
Paula Fikkert
Teresa Flanagan
Caroline Floccia
Megan Foley
Tom Fritzsche
Rebecca L.A. Frost
Anja Gampe
Judit Gervain
Nayeli Gonzalez-Gomez
Anna Gupta
Laura E. Hahn
Hamlin J Kiley
EE Hannon
N Havron
J Hay
M Hernik
B Höhle
DM Houston
LH Howard
M Ishikawa
S Itakura
I Jackson
KV Jakobsen
M Jarto
SP Johnson
C Junge
D Karadag
N Kartushina
DJ Kellier
T Keren-Portnoy
K Klassen
M Kline
E-S Ko
JF Kominsky
JE Kosie
HE Kragness
AAR Krieger
F Krieger
J Lany
RJ Lazo
M Lee
C Leservoisier
C Levelt
C Lew-Williams
M Lippold
U Liszkowski
L Liu
SG Luke
RA Lundwall
Cassia V Macchi
N Mani

Abstract

Psychological scientists have become increasingly concerned with issues related to methodology and replicability, and infancy researchers in particular face specific challenges related to replicability: For example, high-powered studies are difficult to conduct, testing conditions vary across labs, and different labs have access to different infant populations. Addressing these concerns, we report on a large-scale, multisite study aimed at (a) assessing the overall replicability of a single theoretically important phenomenon and (b) examining methodological, cultural, and developmental moderators. We focus on infants’ preference for infant-directed speech (IDS) over adult-directed speech (ADS). Stimuli of mothers speaking to their infants and to an adult in North American English were created using seminaturalistic laboratory-based audio recordings. Infants’ relative preference for IDS and ADS was assessed across 67 laboratories in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia using the three common methods for measuring infants’ discrimination (head-turn preference, central fixation, and eye tracking). The overall meta-analytic effect size (Cohen’s d) was 0.35, 95% confidence interval = [0.29, 0.42], which was reliably above zero but smaller than the meta-analytic mean computed from previous literature (0.67). The IDS preference was significantly stronger in older children, in those children for whom the stimuli matched their native language and dialect, and in data from labs using the head-turn preference procedure. Together, these findings replicate the IDS preference but suggest that its magnitude is modulated by development, native-language experience, and testing procedure.

Publication Date

2020-01-01

Publication Title

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Volume

3

Issue

1

ISSN

2515-2459

Embargo Period

2022-08-09

First Page

24

Last Page

52

10.1177/2515245919900809" data-hide-no-mentions="true">

Share

COinS