ORCID
- Bacon, Alison: 0000-0003-4279-3814
- Walsh, Clare: 0000-0002-5385-2325
Abstract
Counterfactual thinking (CFT) involves the mental simulation of alternatives to the past. In contrast, prefactual thinking (PFT) simulates potential outcomes that have yet to happen. Individuals differ in the extent to which they think in these ways, but we know little about how personality is implicated in these differences. This study investigated the relationship between Big Five personality traits and levels of spontaneous CFT and PFT embedded within a fictional diary entry. Results indicated that CFT was related to high neuroticism and low agreeableness, while PFT was related to low neuroticism and high agreeableness, as well as high extraversion. This suggests that CFT and PFT are, in part, dispositionally based and may be predicted by Big Five measures. This has implications for our understanding of individual differences in terms of the functionality of CFT and PFT and their potential influence on life outcomes.
DOI
10.1177/0276236620905810
Publication Date
2020-02-14
Publication Title
Imagination, Cognition and Personality
Embargo Period
2020-04-07
Organisational Unit
School of Psychology
Keywords
counterfactual thinking, prefactual thinking, Big Five, neuroticism, agreeableness, extraversion
Recommended Citation
Bacon, A. M., Walsh, C., & Briazu, R. (2020) 'Looking Behind and Looking Ahead: Personality Differences in Counterfactual and Prefactual Thinking', Imagination, Cognition and Personality, . Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236620905810
