ORCID
- Byng, Richard: 0000-0001-7411-9467
Abstract
Background: Accessing and receiving care remotely (by telephone, video or online) became the default option during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but in-person care has unique benefits in some circumstances. We are studying UK general practices as they try to balance remote and in-person care, with recurrent waves of COVID-19 and various post-pandemic backlogs. Methods: Mixed-methods (mostly qualitative) case study across 11 general practices. Researchers-in-residence have built relationships with practices and become familiar with their contexts and activities; they are following their progress for two years via staff and patient interviews, documents and ethnography, and supporting improvement efforts through co-design. In this paper, we report baseline data. Results: Reflecting our maximum-variety sampling strategy, the 11 practices vary in size, setting, ethos, staffing, population demographics and digital maturity, but share common contextual features—notably system-level stressors such as high workload and staff shortages, and UK’s technical and regulatory infrastructure. We have identified both commonalities and differences between practices in terms of how they: 1] manage the ‘digital front door’ (access and triage) and balance demand and capacity; 2] strive for high standards of quality and safety; 3] ensure digital inclusion and mitigate wider inequalities; 4] support and train their staff (clinical and non-clinical), students and trainees; 5] select, install, pilot and use technologies and the digital infrastructure which support them; and 6] involve patients in their improvement efforts. Conclusions: General practices’ responses to pandemic-induced disruptive innovation appear unique and situated. We anticipate that by focusing on depth and detail, this longitudinal study will throw light on why a solution that works well in one practice does not work at all in another. As the study unfolds, we will explore how practices achieve timely diagnosis of urgent or serious illness and manage continuity of care, long-term conditions and complex needs.
DOI
10.3310/nihropenres.13290.2
Publication Date
2022-11-29
Publication Title
NIHR Open Research
Volume
2
ISSN
2633-4402
Embargo Period
2023-02-23
Organisational Unit
Peninsula Medical School
First Page
47
Last Page
47
Recommended Citation
Greenhalgh, T., Shaw, S., Alvarez, N., Byng, R., Clarke, A., Dakin, F., Faulkner, S., Hemmings, N., Husain, L., Kalin, A., Ladds, E., Moore, L., Rosen, R., Rybczynska-Bunt, S., Wherton, J., & Wieringa, S. (2022) 'Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies', NIHR Open Research, 2, pp. 47-47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13290.2
