ORCID
- Sheaff, Rod: 0000-0002-7984-2627
- Byng, Richard: 0000-0001-7411-9467
Abstract
Background: In quasi-markets governance over healthcare providers is mediated by commissioners. Different commissioners apply different combinations of six methods of control (’media of power’) for exercising governance: managerial performance, negotiation, discursive control, incentives, competition and juridical control. This paper compares how English and German healthcare commissioners do so. Methods: Systematic comparison of observational national-level case studies in terms of six media of power, using data from multiple sources. Results: The comparison exposes and contrasts two basic generic modes of commissioning: 1. Surrogate planning (English NHS), in which a negotiated order involving micro-commissioning, provider competition, financial incentives and penalties are the dominant media of commissioner power over providers. 2. Case-mix commissioning (Germany), in which managerial performance, an ‘episode based’ negotiated order and juridical controls appear the dominant media of commissioner power. Conclusions: Governments do not necessarily maximise commissioners’ power over providers by implementing as many media of power as possible because these media interact, some complementing and others inhibiting each other. In particular, patient choice of provider inhibits commissioners’ use of provider competition as a means of control.
DOI
10.1186/1472-6963-13-S1-S8
Publication Date
2013-05-15
Publication Title
BMC Health Services Research
Volume
13
First Page
1
Last Page
10
Organisational Unit
Peninsula Medical School
Recommended Citation
Sheaff, R., Chambers, N., Charles, N., Exworthy, M., Mahon, A., Byng, R., & Mannion, R. (2013) 'How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany', BMC Health Services Research, 13, pp. 1-10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-S1-S8
