ORCID
- Julian Elston: 0000-0003-1378-5030
- Felix Gradinger: 0000-0001-8335-4047
- Sheena Asthana: 0000-0002-1483-2719
- Richard Byng: 0000-0001-7411-9467
Abstract
Introduction: Intermediate care (IC) was redesigned to manage more complex, older patients in the community, avoid admissions and facilitate earlier hospital discharge. The service was ‘enhanced’ by employing GPs, pharmacists and the voluntary sector to be part of a daily interdisciplinary team meeting, working alongside social workers and community staff (the traditional model).Methods: A controlled before-and-after study, using mixed methods and a nested case study. Enhanced IC in one locality (Coastal) is compared with four other localities where IC was not enhanced until the following year (controls), using system-wide performance data (N = 4,048) together withad hocdata collected on referral-type, staff inputs and patient experience (N = 72).Results: Coastal showed statistically significant increase in EIC referrals to 11.6% (95%CI: 10.8%–12.4%), with a growing proportion from GPs (2.9%, 95%CI: 2.5%–3.3%); more people being cared for at home (10.5%, 95%CI: 9.8%–11.2%), shorter episode lengths (9.0 days, CI 95%: 7.6–10.4 days) and lower bed-day rates in ≥70 year-olds (0.17, 95%CI: 0.179–0.161). The nested case study showed medical, pharmacist and voluntary sector input into cases, a more holistic, coordinated service focused on patient priorities and reduced acute hospital admissions (5.5%).Discussion and conclusion: Enhancing IC through greater acute, primary care and voluntary sector integration can lead to more complex, older patients being managed in the community, with modest impacts on service efficiency, system activity, and notional costs off-set by perceived benefits.
DOI Link
Publication Date
2022-02-14
Publication Title
International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume
22
Issue
1
ISSN
1568-4156
Acceptance Date
2022-01-28
Deposit Date
2022-02-14
Embargo Period
2022-02-16
Funding
This work was funded by the Torbay Medical Research Fund (http://www.torbaymrf.info/) and supported by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula (PenARC). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the PenARC or the Department of Health and Social Care. This evaluation was supported by Torbay Medical Research Fund (TMRF project number 120) and Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust (TSDFT).
Keywords
intermediate care, multi-disciplinary teams, person-centred care, voluntary sector, early supported discharge
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Elston, J., Gradinger, F., Asthana, S., Fox, M., Dawson, L., Butler, D., & Byng, R. (2022) 'Impact of ‘Enhanced’ Intermediate Care Integrating Acute, Primary and Community Care and the Voluntary Sector in Torbay and South Devon, UK', International Journal of Integrated Care, 22(1). Available at: 10.5334/ijic.5665
